Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196732›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2023

Cervical wound dehiscence following internal fixation of the cervical and thoracic spine: a report of three cases.

Joshua Hardham, John J Pisquiy, Louis Bivona

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua HardhamSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
John J PisquiyDepartment of Orthopaedics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Louis BivonaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
West Virginia University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Wound dehiscence is a known postoperative complication, but in cervical spine surgery it is rare and there is a lack of documented literature. This case report discusses novel complications of wound dehiscence in three patients who were treated with spinous process ostectomies after posterior cervical surgeries. Case Description: In total three cases are reported in these reports. Case one documents the management of a patient with full-thickness cervical wound dehiscence following a cervical paraspinal infection corrected with posterior spinal fixation and fusion. This patient was treated with resection of the prominent spinous processes. Case two documents the management of a patient with an odontoid fracture requiring revision surgery. The patient developed a full-thickness wound dehiscence and was treated with resection of the prominent spinous processes. Case three was a patient suffering from a T9 spinal cord injury who was also treated for multiple vertebral fractures. The patient eventually developed internal cervical wound dehiscence which resulted in removal of the prominent spinous processes. Conclusions: This case report documents the successful treatment of cervical wound dehiscence which is a rare postoperative complication of cervical spinal surgery. This information is valuable as treatment strategies and research into cervical wound dehiscence are limited to a single case report.

Indexed as

case reportCervical wound dehiscenceinternal fixationspinous process resection

Identifiers

PMID38196732
PMCPMC10772659
OpenAlexW4390083645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.