ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023
Outcomes comparison of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with high DNA fragmentation: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Recommendations for the Management of Male Infertility: A Consensus from the Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee.The world journal of men's health · 2026Review
- Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Native Semen: A Reflection of Apoptotic and Non-Viable Spermatozoa and Its Implications for Assisted Reproduction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Sperm DNA fragmentation and its impact on pregnancy outcomes: a narrative review focusing on threshold definition and clinical strategies.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Sperm DNA fragmentation: how to test, when to test, and what to do with abnormal results-a pragmatic mini-review for clinical practice.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Retrospective cohort study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes using testicularTranslational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in men with spinal cord injury using sperm retrieved by electroejaculation and testicular sperm extraction methods: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026Article
- Prostatitis-Related Male Infertility: From Inflammation and Dysbiosis to Sperm DNA Damage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Redox-Genomic Crosstalk: Linking Oxidative Stress, Sperm DNA Fragmentation, and Epigenetics in Personalized Management of Male Infertility.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Detection of sperm DNA damage in male infertility patients and evaluation of Levocarnitine efficacy using sperm chromatin diffusion (SCD) and AI-DFI methods: a cross-sectional study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Review
- Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Fertility.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Sperm DNA Fragmentation in Male Infertility: Tests, Mechanisms, Meaning and Sperm Population to Be Tested.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy of Various Sperm Selection Strategies in Obtaining Sperm with Improved DNA Integrity: A Prospective Study.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The testicular sperm instead of ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in infertile men with high sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is a controversial topic. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether couples with high level of SDF will benefit more from intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular sperm (Testi-ICSI) as compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated sperm (Ejac-ICSI). Methods: A systematic search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), encompassing studies from the earliest record until May 2022. We included studies analyzing comparative pregnancy outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for ICSI in infertile men with high DNA fragmentation. The risks of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, respectively. Results: Eleven studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that SDF levels revealed a significant difference association [odds ratio (OR) =-25.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): -34.82, -16.81; I Conclusions: Results of this updated meta-analysis reveal that SDF rates are lower in testicular sperm than in ejaculated sperm and that Testi-ICSI is correlated with better clinical outcomes, including higher CPRs, higher LBRs, and lower MRs in infertile males with high SDF levels. Nevertheless, with the overall low to moderate quality of the studies, further well-designed controlled studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.