ArticleATS scholar2023
A Quality Improvement Approach to Modification of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum.
Article in ATS scholar, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: There is increasing emphasis on resident involvement in quality improvement (QI) efforts, yet resident engagement in QI has remained low for many reasons. Although QI methods are classically applied to clinical processes, there are many opportunities to incorporate QI principles into curricular design and implementation. Objective: Demonstrate the utility of QI methods when applied to curricular design and the implementation of a novel point-of-care ultrasound portfolio development and quality assurance program at a large internal medicine residency program. Methods: We applied foundational QI methods, including process mapping, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, time-trap identification, run-chart analysis, and qualitative interviews throughout the curricular design and implementation phases to rapidly identify areas for improvement and perform timely tests of change. Results: Fifty-one interns participated in the curriculum, submitting 731 images in the first trimester. Process mapping and submission review revealed that 29% of images were saved to the incorrect digital archive. Resident-reviewer interpretation concordance was present in 80.7% of submissions. In 95.2% of completed quality assurance cards, the same information was provided in the commentary feedback and the evaluator's checklists, representing a time trap. Interventions included restricting access to image archives and removing redundant fields from quality assurance cards. The time to feedback fell from 69.5 to 6.5 days, demonstrating nonrandom variation via run-chart analysis. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates the successful application of QI methods to a novel point-of-care ultrasound curriculum. The systematic use of these methodologies in curricular design and implementation allows expeditious curricular improvement. Emphasizing the relevance of QI methods to subject matter beyond clinical processes may increase resident engagement in QI efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.