Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196648›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

One LLM is not Enough: Harnessing the Power of Ensemble Learning for Medical Question Answering.

Han Yang, Mingchen Li, Huixue Zhou, Yongkang Xiao, Qian Fang, Rui Zhang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficient and accurate medical AI: MediLore and MediOut.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Han YangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-4322-6753
Mingchen LiDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Huixue ZhouInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Yongkang XiaoInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Qian FangH. Milton Stewart School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rui ZhangDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-3585

Funding

Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To enhance the accuracy and reliability of diverse medical question-answering (QA) tasks and investigate efficient approaches deploying the Large Language Models (LLM) technologies, We developed a novel ensemble learning pipeline by utilizing state-of-the-art LLMs, focusing on improving performance on diverse medical QA datasets. Materials and Methods: Our study employs three medical QA datasets: PubMedQA, MedQA-USMLE, and MedMCQA, each presenting unique challenges in biomedical question-answering. The proposed LLM-Synergy framework, focusing exclusively on zero-shot cases using LLMs, incorporates two primary ensemble methods. The first is a Boosting-based weighted majority vote ensemble, where decision-making is expedited and refined by assigning variable weights to different LLMs through a boosting algorithm. The second method is Cluster-based Dynamic Model Selection, which dynamically selects the most suitable LLM votes for each query, based on the characteristics of question contexts, using a clustering approach. Results: The Majority Weighted Vote and Dynamic Model Selection methods demonstrate superior performance compared to individual LLMs across three medical QA datasets. Specifically, the accuracies are 35.84%, 96.21%, and 37.26% for MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and MedQA-USMLE, respectively, with the Majority Weighted Vote. Correspondingly, the Dynamic Model Selection yields slightly higher accuracies of 38.01%, 96.36%, and 38.13%. Conclusion: The LLM-Synergy framework with two ensemble methods, represents a significant advancement in leveraging LLMs for medical QA tasks and provides an innovative way of efficiently utilizing the development with LLM Technologies, customing for both existing and potentially future challenge tasks in biomedical and health informatics research.

Indexed as

Ensemble LearningHealthcare AILarge Language ModelsMedical Question Answering

Identifiers

PMID38196648
PMCPMC10775333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.