Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196625›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Financial Cost Analysis Associated with a Locomotor Exercise Randomized Controlled Trial in Chronic Stroke.

Emily M Hazen, Bria L Bartsch, Sandra A Billinger

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily M HazenDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0009-0005-6058-4129
Bria L BartschDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Sandra A BillingerDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-1618-7207

Funding

University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC)P30AG072973 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jaime Perales Puchalt · 2021 to 2026
$25.3M
High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: HIT-Stroke Trial 2R01HD093694 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Pierce Boyne · 2018 to 2026
$6.1M
Kansas University Training Program in Neurological and Rehabilitation SciencesT32HD057850 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jacob J. Sosnoff · 2009 to 2026
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093694NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-stroke recovery trials pose distinct recruitment and retention challenges, and understanding the financial requirements of conducting randomized controlled trials is crucial to ensure sufficient resources for successful study execution. The purpose of this analysis was to quantify the costs at a single site with a large catchment area of the Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke, HIT Stroke Trial. Methods: To determine cost, study expense reports were gathered and divided into four categories: oversight, recruitment, retention, and outcome assessments. Categories were then further divided into chronological order for initial contact and prescreening, consenting, initial screening, and baseline testing. The 12-week intervention was divided into 4-week blocks: intervention block 1, post 4-week outcome testing, intervention block 2, post 8-week outcome testing, intervention block 3, and post 12-week outcome testing. Results: Total direct cost for site execution was $539,768 with cost per participant approximated as $35,984. Oversight costs accounted for 65.8% of the budget at $355,661. To achieve goals related to inclusive participant recruitment ($21,923) and retention ($28,009), our site costs totaled $49,932. Direct study-related costs included screening assessments ($5,905), baseline assessments ($15,028), intervention ($76,952), and outcome assessments ($36,288). Conclusion: Clinical trials on walking rehabilitation and exercise, especially those involving multiple assessment visits, require intensive oversight. This cost analysis provides important and critical insight into the expenses required to successfully execute an exercise-based walking rehabilitation trial in the United States.

Indexed as

Aerobic ExerciseCerebrovascular AccidentRecruitmentRehabilitationRetentionWalking

Identifiers

PMID38196625
PMCPMC10775328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.