ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms.
Chao Yan, Henry H Ong, Monika E Grabowska, Matthew S Krantz, Wu-Chen Su, Alyson L Dickson, Josh F Peterson, QiPing Feng, Dan M Roden, C Michael Stein and 3 more
Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraphArticle in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
13 authors.
Henry H OngDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Monika E GrabowskaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Matthew S KrantzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Wu-Chen SuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Alyson L DicksonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Josh F PetersonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Dan M RodenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-6302-0389 C Michael SteinDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
V Eric KerchbergerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-0342-1965 Bradley A MalinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Wei-Qi WeiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Funding
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3MClinical and Translational Training Program in Pulmonary MedicineT32HL087738 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lorraine B Ware · 2007 to 2026
$7.0MVanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records (VGER) ProjectU01HG011181 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAN M RODEN, Digna R Velez Edwards · 2020 to 2026
$7.0MMedical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM152284 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher S. Williams · 2024 to 2026
$4.8MDrug repositioning for Alzheimer's disease via genetics, electronic health records, and human iPSC modelsR01AG069900 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LI, BINGSHAN, WEI, WEI-QI · 2021 to 2025
$4.0MGenetics and Triglycerides: opportunities for new approaches to identify therapiesR01HL163854 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FENG, QIPING · 2022 to 2025
$3.1MTargeting Residual ASCVD Risk by Integrating Genetics and Clinical DataR01HL171809 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Qiping Feng, Wei-Qi Wei · 2024 to 2026
$2.6MPheMAP: Measured, Automated Profile to Facilitate High Throughput PhenotypingR01GM139891 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WEI, WEI-QI · 2021 to 2024
$1.7MSystematically screening and validating drug repurposing candidates for Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR56AG084550 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FENG, QIPING, WEI, WEI-QI · 2024 to 2024
$875kTissue-specific functional genomics in the acute respiratory distress syndromeK01HL157755 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KERCHBERGER, VERN ERIC · 2021 to 2025
$845kComputational drug repurposing for Alzheimer's diseaseF30AG080885 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Monika Eliana Grabowska · 2023 to 2026
$177kNHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011181NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL157755NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL163854NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL171809NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL087738NIA NIH HHS F30 AG080885NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069900NIA NIH HHS R56 AG084550NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139891NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152284
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Objectives: Phenotyping is a core task in observational health research utilizing electronic health records (EHRs). Developing an accurate algorithm demands substantial input from domain experts, involving extensive literature review and evidence synthesis. This burdensome process limits scalability and delays knowledge discovery. We investigate the potential for leveraging large language models (LLMs) to enhance the efficiency of EHR phenotyping by generating high-quality algorithm drafts. Materials and Methods: We prompted four LLMs-GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 of ChatGPT, Claude 2, and Bard-in October 2023, asking them to generate executable phenotyping algorithms in the form of SQL queries adhering to a common data model (CDM) for three phenotypes (i.e., type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and hypothyroidism). Three phenotyping experts evaluated the returned algorithms across several critical metrics. We further implemented the top-rated algorithms and compared them against clinician-validated phenotyping algorithms from the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network. Results: GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 exhibited significantly higher overall expert evaluation scores in instruction following, algorithmic logic, and SQL executability, when compared to Claude 2 and Bard. Although GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 effectively identified relevant clinical concepts, they exhibited immature capability in organizing phenotyping criteria with the proper logic, leading to phenotyping algorithms that were either excessively restrictive (with low recall) or overly broad (with low positive predictive values). Conclusion: GPT versions 3.5 and 4 are capable of drafting phenotyping algorithms by identifying relevant clinical criteria aligned with a CDM. However, expertise in informatics and clinical experience is still required to assess and further refine generated algorithms.
Indexed as
ChatGPTElectronic health recordsLarge language modelsPhenotyping
Identifiers
PMID38196578
PMCPMC10775330
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390