Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196562›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Methodological procedure based on quantitizing/liquefying: a case study to assess work climate in an emergency department.

Salvador Chacón-Moscoso, M Teresa Anguera, Susana Sanduvete-Chaves, José A Lozano-Lozano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvador Chacón-MoscosoDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
M Teresa AngueraFaculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Susana Sanduvete-ChavesDepartamento de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
José A Lozano-LozanoInstituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Universidad de Sevilla · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Chile · CLUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the assessment of health organizations, results-based indicators are mainly used, with no consideration of internal work dynamics. This type of assessment forfeits much of the rich, useful information needed to make decisions on improving the organization. In order to address this, a rigorous procedure based on mixed methods is laid out here on gathering, analyzing, and interpreting data associated with the implementation process. Methods: A 55-year-old doctor was selected at random from among the staff who volunteered to be interviewed at the emergency department at a public hospital located in southern Spain for an interview. Qualitative data obtained from the in-depth interview (indirect observation) were progressively systematized (liquefied and quantitized) based on a theoretical framework until a code matrix was obtained, without losing or distorting any information. Afterwards, data quality was controlled using Cohen's kappa ( Results and discussion: The proposed method was applied to the needs assessment of teams in order to evaluate that work climate in the hospital's emergency department Health Services of a hospital. Data quality control yielded an adequate result (

Indexed as

emergency departmenthospitalin-depth interviewindirect observational methodologymixed methodspolar coordinate analysissingle-case studywork climate

Identifiers

PMID38196562
PMCPMC10774222
OpenAlexW4390111653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.