Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196523›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as second-line and third-line regimen for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Jie Zhao, Yongzhong Guo, Tianshuo Feng, Dawei Rong, Xiangyi Kong, Tian Huang, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Hooman Yarmohammadi, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Deming Zhu and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. [Chinese expert consensus on the use of standardized second-line drugs for primary hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jie Zhao *Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Yongzhong Guo *Department of General Surgery, Ili & Jiangsu Joint Institute of Health, Ili, China.
Tianshuo Feng *Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Dawei RongHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Xiangyi KongHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Tian HuangHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Victor Lopez-LopezDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Hooman YarmohammadiDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yoshihiro SakamotoDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Deming ZhuHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Aihua YaoHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Yongxiang XiaHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESKyorin University Hospital · JPMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is an unmet need regarding subsequent treatments in patients that fail ICI. Regorafenib is a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, which could increase programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors and increase intra-tumoral CD8 Methods: Data of patients with advanced HCC who had failed combined TKIs plus ICI treatment and were afterwards treated with combined regorafenib plus a PD-1 inhibitor were reviewed. All patients had received PD-1 inhibitors as part of the first-line treatment and regorafenib every 4 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, or physician/patient withdrawal. The clinical data, previous treatment strategies, follow-up imaging results, and adverse events (AEs) during follow-ups were recorded. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 5.0 was used to evaluate AEs and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1 was used to evaluate response. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR). Results: From November 15, 2020, to January 31, 2022, data of 17 patients with advanced HCC that met the criteria were reviewed. The cohort included 16 men and 1 woman with a median age of 54 years (interquartile range, 46 to 63 years). Sixteen patients had Child-Pugh class A (n=16, 94.12%) and one with class B (n=1, 15.9%) liver disease. Thirteen patients received second-line treatment, and the remaining patients received third-line treatment. All patients received at least 1 dose of PD-1 inhibitors. The median follow-up duration was 7.62 months. Twelve recipients experienced treatment-related AEs. The most frequent AE (≥5%) included fatigue (17.64%), diarrhea (17.65%), proteinuria (5.88%), bleeding gums (11.76%), and hypertension (11.76%). No grade-4 AE or new safety signals were identified. The ORR and DCR were 41.2% and 64.7%, respectively, and the median PFS was 5.09 months. Conclusions: Regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor is a promising regimen in treating patients with advanced HCC owing to its safety and effectiveness as well as low incidence of serious AEs with its use.

Indexed as

advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (advanced HCC)Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)immune resistanceregorafenibsecond-line treatment

Identifiers

PMID38196523
PMCPMC10772671
OpenAlexW4390350188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.