ArticleCureus2023
Audit of Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a District General Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Acute gallstone diseases are common surgical emergencies, accounting for approximately one-third of emergency surgical admissions. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard choice of treatment for gallstone diseases and is currently one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the United Kingdom. Majority of these procedures are carried out as elective cases. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines and other upper gastrointestinal surgery specialty bodies encourage early emergency surgery in acute symptomatic gallstone disease. We assessed emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, United Kingdom and compared the practice against NICE and British Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Society (BBUGSS) recommendations. Methods This is a snapshot retrospective audit, assessing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy practice over a nine-month period from November 2022 to July 2023. Variables assessed were demographics, duration of symptoms prior to surgery, imaging modality, indications, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, operative difficulty, intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and readmission rates. These variables were compared against both NICE and BBUGSS standards. We aimed to establish baseline data to encourage emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomies in our hospital and reduce repeated hospital visits for patients with acute gallbladder disease. Results Forty-eight patients had emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the period reviewed, mean age was 44.3 years and females accounted for approximately 71% (n=34) of the group. 66.7% (n=32) of patients had their surgery within seven days of diagnosis with acute gallstone disease; 50% (n=24) of patients had no adverse intraoperative event. No patient had biliary tract injury despite a high number of difficult cases. Overall there was no correlation between duration before surgery and intraoperative difficulty or readmission rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.