Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196357›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Hummingbirds use distinct control strategies for forward and hovering flight.

Vikram B Baliga, Roslyn Dakin, Douglas R Wylie, Douglas L Altshuler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vikram B BaligaDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4.ORCID 0000-0002-9367-8974
Roslyn DakinDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-3975
Douglas R WylieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R3.
Douglas L AltshulerDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4.ORCID 0000-0002-1364-3617

Funding

CIHRHuman Frontier Science ProgramNSERC postdoctoral fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of optic flow is important for generating optomotor responses to mediate retinal image stabilization, and it can also be used during ongoing locomotion for centring and velocity control. Previous work in hummingbirds has separately examined the roles of optic flow during hovering and when centring through a narrow passage during forward flight. To develop a hypothesis for the visual control of forward flight velocity, we examined the behaviour of hummingbirds in a flight tunnel where optic flow could be systematically manipulated. In all treatments, the animals exhibited periods of forward flight interspersed with bouts of spontaneous hovering. Hummingbirds flew fastest when they had a reliable signal of optic flow. All optic flow manipulations caused slower flight, suggesting that hummingbirds had an expected optic flow magnitude that was disrupted. In addition, upward and downward optic flow drove optomotor responses for maintaining altitude during forward flight. When hummingbirds made voluntary transitions to hovering, optomotor responses were observed to all directions. Collectively, these results are consistent with hummingbirds controlling flight speed via mechanisms that use an internal forward model to predict expected optic flow whereas flight altitude and hovering position are controlled more directly by sensory feedback from the environment.

Indexed as

AltitudeBirdsAnimalsFeedback, SensoryLocomotionflight controlhummingbirdsmanoeuvrabilitystabilityvision

Identifiers

PMID38196357
PMCPMC10777153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.