Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
36 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.
Fabian A BoetzlDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala SE-750 07, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5121-3370
Douglas SponslerDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg 97074 Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4892-9332
Péter Batáry'Lendület' Landscape and Conservation Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Botany, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, 2163 Vácrátót, Alkotmány út 2-4, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-6996
Klaus BirkhoferDepartment of Ecology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus 03046, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9301-2443
Michal KnappFaculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha-Suchdol 165 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4487-7317
Jochen KraussDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg 97074 Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-9117
Bea MaasDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Division of Biodiversity Dynamics and Conservation, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9461-3243
Emily A MartinDepartment of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-9105
Aliette Bosem BaillodResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse 113, Postfach, Frick 5070, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3706-5177
Gerard BotaLandscape Dynamics and Biodiversity Program, Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC), Crtra. Sant Llorenç de Morunys, km 2, 25280 Solsona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9020-7272
Vincent BretagnolleCEBC, UMR 7372, CNRS & La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2320-7755
Lluís BrotonsLandscape Dynamics and Biodiversity Program, Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC), Crtra. Sant Llorenç de Morunys, km 2, 25280 Solsona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4826-4457
Thomas FrankInstitute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna 1180, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6377-719X
Moritz FusseriES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Ecosystem Analysis, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.
David GiraltLandscape Dynamics and Biodiversity Program, Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC), Crtra. Sant Llorenç de Morunys, km 2, 25280 Solsona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9712-1957
Ezequiel GonzálezFaculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha-Suchdol 165 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-1771
Anouschka R HofWildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-0089
Henryk LukaResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse 113, Postfach, Frick 5070, Switzerland.
Ronan MarrecEcologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés (EDYSAN, UMR CNRS 7058), Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1607-4939
Michael A NashDepartment of Ecology, Environment & Evolution, School of Life Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4470-2832
Katherina NgFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3511-0923
Brigitte PoulinTour du Valat Research Institute for the conservation of Mediterranean wetlands, Le Sambuc, 13200 Arles, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2241-8905
Gavin M SiriwardenaBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-1186
Teja TscharntkeAgroecology, Department of Crop Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4482-3178
Laura Van VoorenFaculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Forest and Water Management, Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267, 9090 Gontrode, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8295-0178
Muhammad Zubair-AnjumDepartment of Zoology & Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-6839
Martin H EntlingiES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Ecosystem Analysis, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-6407
Ingolf Steffan-DewenterDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg 97074 Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1359-3944
Jens SchirmeliES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Ecosystem Analysis, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstrasse 7, Landau 76829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-3376
University of Würzburg · DEForest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia · ESInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUniversity of Koblenz and Landau · DEAgroscope · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRForschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau · CHAustralian National University · AUBOKU University · ATBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEBritish Trust for Ornithology · GBConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZGhent University · BEInstitute of Ecology and Botany · HUJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DELa Trobe University · AUParisTech · FRPir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University · PKSwiss Ornithological Institute · CH
Funding
ERA-Net BiodivERsAGerman Ministry of Research and EducationGerman Research Foundation and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Natural pest and weed regulation are essential for agricultural production, but the spatial distribution of natural enemies within crop fields and its drivers are mostly unknown. Using 28 datasets comprising 1204 study sites across eight Western and Central European countries, we performed a quantitative synthesis of carabid richness, activity densities and functional traits in relation to field edges (i.e. distance functions). We show that distance functions of carabids strongly depend on carabid functional traits, crop type and, to a lesser extent, adjacent non-crop habitats. Richness of both carnivores and granivores, and activity densities of small and granivorous species decreased towards field interiors, whereas the densities of large species increased. We found strong distance decays in maize and vegetables whereas richness and densities remained more stable in cereals, oilseed crops and legumes. We conclude that carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes are driven by the complex interplay of crop types, adjacent non-crop habitats and further landscape parameters with great potential for targeted agroecological management. In particular, our synthesis indicates that a higher edge-interior ratio can counter the distance decay of carabid richness per field and thus likely benefits natural pest and weed regulation, hence contributing to agricultural sustainability.
Indexed as
AgricultureFabaceaeCrops, AgriculturalEuropePhenotypedistance decayecosystem servicesground beetlesnatural pest and weed controlspecies spilloversustainable agriculture
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Distance functions of carabids in crop fields depend on functional traits, crop type and adjacent habitat: a synthesis. · full record | OpenQuestion