Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196118›Full record

ArticleKorean circulation journal2024

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Ring-Type Blood Pressure Measurement Device Compared With 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Device.

Huijin Lee, Sungjoon Park, Hyuktae Kwon, Belong Cho, Jin Ho Park, Hae-Young Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean circulation journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06084065 (Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Ring-type Blood Pressure Measurement Device Compared With 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06084065 naunknown statusnot on this map

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Ring-type Blood Pressure Measurement Device Compared With 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Device: Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsHypertension, Blood Pressure, Systolic Hypertension, Diastolic HypertensionArmsCART-I Plus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Digital hypertension - what we need for the high-quality management of hypertension in the new era.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huijin LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5930-2705
Sungjoon ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-5145
Hyuktae KwonDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0312-3650
Belong ChoDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-689X
Jin Ho ParkDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3942-6813
Hae-Young LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-4102
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

Sky Labs Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the applicability and precision of a ring-type cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement device, CART-I Plus, compared to conventional 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).

methodsForty patients were recruited, and 33 participants were included in the final analysis. Each participant wore both CART-I Plus and ABPM devices on the same arm for approximately 24 hours. BP estimation from CART-I Plus, derived from photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, were compared with the corresponding ABPM measurements.

resultsThe CART-I Plus recorded systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values of 131.4±14.1/81.1±12.0, 132.7±13.9/81.9±11.9, and 128.7±14.6/79.3±12.2 mmHg for 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods respectively, compared to ABPM values of 129.7±11.7/84.4±11.2, 131.9±11.6/86.3±11.1, and 124.5±13.6/80.0±12.2 mmHg. Mean differences in SBP/DBP between the two devices were 1.74±6.69/-3.24±6.51 mmHg, 0.75±7.44/-4.41±7.42 mmHg, and 4.15±6.15/-0.67±5.23 mmHg for 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods respectively. Strong correlations were also observed between the devices, with r=0.725 and r=0.750 for transitions in SBP and DBP from daytime to nighttime, respectively (both p<0.001).

conclusionsThe CART-I Plus device, with its unique ring-type design, shows promising accuracy in BP estimation and offers a potential avenue for continuous BP monitoring in clinical practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06084065.

Indexed as

Blood pressureBlood pressure monitor, ambulatoryHome blood pressure monitoringHypertensionPhotoplethysmography

Identifiers

PMID38196118
PMCPMC10864248
OpenAlexW4390706666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.