Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38195996›Full record

SynthesisNature ecology & evolution2024

Meta-analysis reveals that vertebrates enhance plant litter decomposition at the global scale.

Bin Tuo, Pablo García-Palacios, Chao Guo, En-Rong Yan, Matty P Berg, Johannes H C Cornelissen

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Positive effects of species mixing on biodiversity of understory plant communities and soil health in forest plantations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Looking back on 2024.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Bin TuoA-LIFE, Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-955X
Pablo García-PalaciosInstituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Chao GuoForest Zoology, Technische Universität Dresden, Tharandt, Germany. chao.guo@mailbox.tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-7937
En-Rong YanZhejiang Zhoushan Archipelago Observation and Research Station, Tiantong National Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, and Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8064-3334
Matty P BergA-LIFE, Ecology & Evolution, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes H C CornelissenA-LIFE, Systems Ecology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLEast China Normal University · CNTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 2019061401117National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32030068National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32101275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence is mounting that vertebrate defaunation greatly impacts global biogeochemical cycling. Yet, there is no comprehensive assessment of the potential vertebrate influence over plant decomposition, despite litter decay being one of the largest global carbon fluxes. We therefore conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate vertebrate effects on litter mass loss and associated element release across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Here we show that vertebrates affected litter decomposition by various direct and indirect pathways, increasing litter mass loss by 6.7% on average, and up to 34.4% via physical breakdown. This positive vertebrate impact on litter mass loss was consistent across contrasting litter types (woody and non-woody), climatic regions (boreal, temperate and tropical), ecosystem types (aquatic and terrestrial) and vertebrate taxa, but disappeared when evaluating litter nitrogen and phosphorus release. Moreover, we found evidence of interactive effects between vertebrates and non-vertebrate decomposers on litter mass loss, and a larger influence of vertebrates at mid-to-late decomposition stages, contrasting with the invertebrate effect known to be strongest at early decomposition stage. Our synthesis demonstrates a global vertebrate control over litter mass loss, and further stresses the need to account for vertebrates when assessing the impacts of biodiversity loss on biogeochemical cycles.

Indexed as

EcosystemPlantsAnimalsBiodiversityNitrogenVertebratesNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID38195996
OpenAlexW4390706467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.