ArticleScientific reports2024
An RNA-Seq analysis of coronavirus in the skin of the Pangolin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Protection of the Critically Endangered East Asian Pangolin species is hampered by the vulnerability of captive individuals to infection. Studies have previously shown the pangolin to have a unique pseudogenisation of many immunity genes (including IFNE, IFIH1, cGAS, STING, TLR5, and TLR11), and we suspected that these losses could account for this vulnerability. Here we used RNA-Seq data to show the effect of these gene losses on the transcriptional response to a viral skin infection in a deceased pangolin. This virus is very closely related to the one causing the current COVID-19 pandemic in the human population (SARS-CoV2), and we found the most upregulated pathway was the same one previously identified in the lungs of SARS-CoV2-infected humans. As predicted, we found that the pathways downstream of the lost genes were not upregulated. For example, the pseudogenised interferon epsilon (IFNE) is known to be particularly important in epithelial immunity, and we show that interferon-related responses were not upregulated in the infected pangolin skin. We suggest that the pangolin's innate gene pseudogenisation is indeed likely to be responsible for the animal's vulnerability to infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.