ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
The timing phase affected the inconsistency of APHE subtypes of liver observations in patients at risk for HCC on the multi-hepatic arterial phase imaging.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive review of diagnostic, surveillance, and treatment response prediction and assessment.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Image quality in three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen using deep learning denoising technique: intraindividual comparison between T1-weighted sequences with compressed sensing and with a modified Fast 3D mode wheel.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- [Application and prospects of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the diagnosis and evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether liver observations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) display inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes on the multi-hepatic arterial phase imaging (mHAP) and to further investigate factors affecting inconsistent APHE subtype of observations on mHAP imaging.
methodsFrom April 2018 to June 2021, a total of 141 patients at high risk of HCC with 238 liver observations who underwent mHAP MRI acquisitions were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Two experienced radiologists reviewed individual arterial phase imaging independently and assessed the enhancement pattern of each liver observation according to LI-RADS. Another two experienced radiologists identified and recorded the genuine timing phase of each phase independently. When a disagreement appeared between the two radiologists, another expert participated in the discussion to get a final decision. A separate descriptive analysis was used for all observations scored APHE by the radiologists. The Kappa coefficient was used to determine the agreement between the two radiologists. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate the factors affecting inconsistent APHE subtype of liver observations on mHAP imaging.
resultsThe interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect agreement on the assessment of timing phase (κ = 0.712-0.887) and evaluation of APHE subtype (κ = 0.795-0.901). A total of 87.8% (209/238) of the observations showed consistent nonrim APHE and 10.2% (24/238) of the observations showed consistent rim APHE on mHAP imaging. A total of 2.1% (5/238) of the liver observations were considered inconsistent APHE subtypes, and all progressed nonrim to rim on mHAP imaging. 87.9% (124/141) of the mHAP acquisitions were all arterial phases and 12.1% (17/141) of the mHAP acquisitions obtained both the arterial phase and portal venous phase. Univariate analysis was performed and found that the timing phase of mHAP imaging affected the consistency of APHE subtype of liver observations. When considering the timing phase and excluding the portal venous phase acquired by mHAP imaging, none of the liver observations showed inconsistent APHE subtypes on mHAP imaging.
conclusionThe timing phase which mHAP acquisition contained portal venous phase affected the inconsistency of APHE subtype of liver observations on mHAP imaging. When evaluating the APHE subtype of liver observations, it's necessary to assess the timing of each phase acquired by the mHAP technique at first.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38195799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.