Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38195785›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2024

Investigation of PET image quality with acquisition time/bed and enhancement of lesion quantification accuracy through deep progressive learning.

Hongxing Yang, Shihao Chen, Ming Qi, Wen Chen, Qing Kong, Jianping Zhang, Shaoli Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EnhancingCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Comparison ofEJNMMI physics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongxing Yang *Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, No. 220, Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-7020
Shihao Chen *Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, No. 220, Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Ming QiKey Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, No. 220, Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Wen ChenKey Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, No. 220, Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Qing KongKey Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, No. 220, Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Jianping ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. zhangjianpin82@126.com.
Shaoli SongKey Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, No. 220, Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China. shaoli-song@163.com.

Funding

key laboratory program of the Education Commission of Shanghai Municipality ZDSYS14005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo improve the PET image quality by a deep progressive learning (DPL) reconstruction algorithm and evaluate the DPL performance in lesion quantification.

methodsWe reconstructed PET images from 48 oncological patients using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and deep progressive learning (DPL) methods. The patients were enrolled into three overlapped studies: 11 patients for image quality assessment (study 1), 34 patients for sub-centimeter lesion quantification (study 2), and 28 patients for imaging of overweight or obese individuals (study 3). In study 1, we evaluated the image quality visually based on four criteria: overall score, image sharpness, image noise, and diagnostic confidence. We also measured the image quality quantitatively using the signal-to-background ratio (SBR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-background ratio (CBR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). To evaluate the performance of the DPL algorithm in quantifying lesions, we compared the maximum standardized uptake values (SUV

resultsDPL produced better PET image quality than OSEM did based on the visual evaluation methods when the acquisition time was 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 min/bed. However, no discernible differences were found between the two methods when the acquisition time was 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 min/bed. Quantitative results showed that DPL had significantly higher values of SBR, CBR, SNR, and CNR than OSEM did for each acquisition time. For sub-centimeter lesion quantification, the SUV

conclusionThe DPL algorithm dramatically enhanced the quality of PET images and enabled more accurate quantification of sub-centimeters lesions in patients and lesions in overweight or obese patients. This is particularly beneficial for overweight or obese patients who usually have lower image quality due to the increased attenuation.

Indexed as

Deep progressive learningImage qualityPET/CTSub-centimeter lesions quantification

Identifiers

PMID38195785
PMCPMC10776545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.