Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38195750›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2024

Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study.

Luisa S Flor, Jason A Anderson, Noah Ahmad, Aleksandr Aravkin, Sinclair Carr, Xiaochen Dai, Gabriela F Gil, Simon I Hay, Matthew J Malloy, Susan A McLaughlin and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 96 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Luisa S FlorInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. lsflor@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-512X
Jason A AndersonInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Noah AhmadInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aleksandr AravkinInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sinclair CarrInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Xiaochen DaiInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0289-7814
Gabriela F GilInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Simon I HayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0611-7272
Matthew J MalloyInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Susan A McLaughlinInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Erin C MullanyInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christopher J L MurrayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4930-9450
Erin M O'ConnellInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chukwuma OkerekeInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Reed J D SorensenInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joanna WhisnantInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Peng ZhengInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emmanuela GakidouInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8992-591X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a gradual decline in smoking rates over time, exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) continues to cause harm to nonsmokers, who are disproportionately children and women living in low- and middle-income countries. We comprehensively reviewed the literature published by July 2022 concerning the adverse impacts of SHS exposure on nine health outcomes. Following, we quantified each exposure-response association accounting for various sources of uncertainty and evaluated the strength of the evidence supporting our analyses using the Burden of Proof Risk Function methodology. We found all nine health outcomes to be associated with SHS exposure. We conservatively estimated that SHS increases the risk of ischemic heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes and lung cancer by at least around 8%, 5%, 1% and 1%, respectively, with the evidence supporting these harmful associations rated as weak (two stars). The evidence supporting the harmful associations between SHS and otitis media, asthma, lower respiratory infections, breast cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was weaker (one star). Despite the weak underlying evidence for these associations, our results reinforce the harmful effects of SHS on health and the need to prioritize advancing efforts to reduce active and passive smoking through a combination of public health policies and education initiatives.

Indexed as

AsthmaBreast NeoplasmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Respiratory Tract InfectionsTobacco Smoke PollutionChildFemaleHumansTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID38195750
PMCPMC10803272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.