Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38195663›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

The feasibility and acceptability of a rewards system based on food purchasing behaviour in secondary school cashless canteens: the Eat4Treats (E4T) cluster feasibility, non-randomised, controlled intervention study.

Sarah E Moore, Ciara Rooney, Charlotte E Neville, Ryan McConville, Frank Kee, Claire T McEvoy, Jayne V Woodside, Judith Hanvey, Michelle C McKinley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E MooreCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science A, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Ciara RooneyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science A, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Charlotte E NevilleCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science A, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Ryan McConvilleDepartment of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Ada Lovelace Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TW, UK.
Frank KeeCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science A, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Claire T McEvoyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science A, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Jayne V WoodsideCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science A, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK.
Judith HanveyEducation Authority Northern Ireland, 40 Academy Street, Belfast, BT1 2NQ, UK.
Michelle C McKinleyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Science A, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK. m.mckinley@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-1504
Queen's University Belfast · GBEducation Authority · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S03756X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing rewards may be an effective method to positively influence children's eating behaviour but evidence to date is limited, particularly in older children. The cashless canteen systems in schools provides a unique opportunity to implement a food-based reward scheme but intervention development work and feasibility testing is needed. The overall aim of the E4T feasibility study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a rewards scheme based on the food purchasing behaviour of pupils in cashless canteens in secondary schools.

methodsA non-randomised, controlled, parallel-group cluster feasibility study conducted in four secondary schools (two intervention and two control) serving areas of the highest social deprivation in Northern Ireland. During the 4-month trial, pupils earned points for foods purchased at the school canteen, with better nutritional choices having a higher value. Pupils could exchange the points they earned for rewards (e.g. stationery, vouchers, sports equipment) via the E4T website. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected from year 9 and 10 pupils (boys and girls aged 12-14 years), teachers and canteen staff to address the feasibility questions.

resultsTwo intervention (one urban, one rural) and one control (urban) school completed the study. Seventy-one percent of 12-14-year-old pupils consented to take part; 1% of parents opted their child out of the study. Questionnaire completion rates were high (6 and 11% of questionnaires were partially completed at baseline and follow-up respectively). Collecting data on food consumed in the canteen was challenging logistically. Focus groups with pupils indicated that the overall concept of E4T was well received and there was a high degree of satisfaction with the rewards available. Pupils and teachers made several suggestions for improvements.

conclusionsE4T was successfully implemented as a result of collaboration between schools, school canteens and cashless canteen providers working with a multidisciplinary research team. It was acceptable to pupils, teachers and canteen staff. The findings suggest a few areas for refining implementation and evaluation processes that would need to be considered in the design of a larger trial, particularly resources required to streamline implementation and ways to optimise pupil engagement.

trial registrationUnder review with https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (retrospective registration-reg number and weblink to be added).

Indexed as

AdolescentsDietFood choiceInterventionNutritionRewardsSchool food

Identifiers

PMID38195663
PMCPMC10775569
OpenAlexW4390743746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.