Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38195572›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024

Management and treatment outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies: evaluation of 10-year data from the KURAMA cohort.

Takayuki Fujii, Koichi Murata, Hideo Onizawa, Akira Onishi, Masao Tanaka, Kosaku Murakami, Kohei Nishitani, Moritoshi Furu, Ryu Watanabe, Motomu Hashimoto and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Takayuki FujiiDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan. fujiit@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Koichi MurataDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Hideo OnizawaDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Akira OnishiDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Masao TanakaDepartment of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Kosaku MurakamiCenter for Cancer Immunotherapy and Immunobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Kohei NishitaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Moritoshi FuruFuru Clinic, 1098 Terasho, Konancho, Koka, Shiga, 5203301, Japan.
Ryu WatanabeDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-7 Asahicho, Abeno, Osaka, 5450051, Japan.
Motomu HashimotoDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-7 Asahicho, Abeno, Osaka, 5450051, Japan.
Hiromu ItoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Takao FujiiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 6410012, Japan.
Tsuneyo MimoriTakeda Clinic for Rheumatic Diseases, 606-3-2, Higashi-Shiokojicho, Sanoh Kyotoekimae Building 1F, Kyoto, 6008216, Japan.
Akio MorinobuDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.
Shuichi MatsudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment, highlighted by biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), have altered the paradigm of RA treatment in the last decade. Therefore, real-world clinical evidence is needed to understand how treatment strategies and outcomes have changed.

methodsUsing an observational cohort of RA from 2012 to 2021, we collected cross-sectional data of RA patients annually to analyze a trend in RA management. For patients who initiated b/tsDMRDs, we evaluated treatment outcomes between b/tsDMARDs. Mixed-effect models were applied to examine the statistical implications of changes over time in treatment outcomes with a background adjustment.

resultsWe analyzed annual cross-sectional data from 5070 patients and longitudinal data from 1816 patients in whom b/tsDMARDs were initiated between 2012 and 2021. b/tsDMARD use increased, whereas glucocorticoid use decreased from 2012 to 2021. Disease activity and functional disability measures improved over time. The percentage of tsDMARD prescriptions considerably increased. All b/tsDMARDs showed clinical improvements in disease activity and functional disability. Statistically, TNFi showed better short-term improvements in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, while IL6Ri demonstrated significant long-term benefits. IL6Ri had better retention rates in switched patients. After adjustment for patient characteristics, the annual change of RA disease activity and functional disability fared significantly better from 2012 to 2021.

conclusionsWith the development of new RA therapeutics, overall treatment outcomes advanced in the past decade.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsBiologicsCohort studyJAK inhibitorsRheumatoid arthritisTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38195572
PMCPMC10775516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.