Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38195539›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Participatory policy analysis in health policy and systems research: reflections from a study in Nepal.

Sujata Sapkota, Simon Rushton, Edwin van Teijlingen, Madhusudan Subedi, Julie Balen, Sujan Gautam, Pratik Adhikary, Padam Simkhada, Sharada P Wasti, Jiban K Karki and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sujata SapkotaManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. drsujata.sapkota@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9887-6868
Simon RushtonManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. simon.rushton@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-9871
Edwin van TeijlingenManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-8583
Madhusudan SubediPatan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-0601
Julie BalenManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4736-8465
Sujan GautamManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-1467
Pratik AdhikaryBournemouth University, Poole, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1678-1692
Padam SimkhadaUniversity of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-6479
Sharada P WastiUniversity of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8833-7801
Jiban K KarkiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-3876
Sarita PandayUniversity of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-1476
Alisha KarkiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5038-6058
Barsha RijalPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-2553
Saugat JoshiPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Srijana BasnetPHASE Nepal, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Sujan B MarahattaManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7277-7853

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T023554/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipatory policy analysis (PPA) as a method in health policy and system research remains underexplored. Using our experiences of conducting PPA workshops in Nepal to explore the impact of the country's move to federalism on its health system, we reflect on the method's strengths and challenges. We provide an account of the study context, the design and implementation of the workshops, and our reflections on the approach's strengths and challenges. Findings on the impact of federalism on the health system are beyond the scope of this manuscript. MAIN BODY: We conducted PPA workshops with a wide range of health system stakeholders (political, administrative and service-level workforce) at the local and provincial levels in Nepal. The workshops consisted of three activities: river of life, brainstorming and prioritization, and problem-tree analysis. Our experiences show that PPA workshops can be a valuable approach to explore health policy and system issues - especially in a context of widespread systemic change which impacts all stakeholders within the health system. Effective engagement of stakeholders and activities that encourage both individual- and system-level reflections and discussions not only help in generating rich qualitative data, but can also address gaps in participants' understanding of practical, technical and political aspects of the health system, aid policy dissemination of research findings, and assist in identifying short- and long-term practice and policy issues that need to be addressed for better health system performance and outcomes. Conducting PPA workshops is, however, challenging for a number of reasons, including the influence of gatekeepers and power dynamics between stakeholders/participants. The role and skills of researchers/facilitators in navigating such challenges are vital for success. Although the long-term impact of such workshops needs further research, our study shows the usefulness of PPA workshops for researchers, for participants and for the wider health system.

conclusionsPPA workshops can effectively generate and synthesize health policy and system evidence through collaborative engagement of health system stakeholders with varied roles. When designed with careful consideration for context and stakeholders' needs, it has great potential as a method in health policy and systems research.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyHealth PolicyHumansNepalPolicy MakingResearch PersonnelHealth policy and systems researchNepalParticipatory policy analysisQualitative evidence

Identifiers

PMID38195539
PMCPMC10775624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.