Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38195537›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2024

Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy.

Mohammad Chehelgerdi, Matin Chehelgerdi, Milad Khorramian-Ghahfarokhi, Marjan Shafieizadeh, Esmaeil Mahmoudi, Fatemeh Eskandari, Mohsen Rashidi, Asghar Arshi, Abbas Mokhtari-Farsani

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 117 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
44.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. In vivo systematic detection of the outcomes of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated DNA repair in skeletal muscle stem cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Pancancer Analysis and the Oncogenic Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad ChehelgerdiNovin Genome (NG) Lab, Research and Development Center for Biotechnology, Shahrekord, Iran. Chehelgerdi1992@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3483-9424
Matin ChehelgerdiNovin Genome (NG) Lab, Research and Development Center for Biotechnology, Shahrekord, Iran.
Milad Khorramian-GhahfarokhiDivision of Biotechnology, Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Marjan ShafieizadehDepartment of Chemistry, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Esmaeil MahmoudiYoung Researchers and Elite Club, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Fatemeh EskandariFaculty of Molecular and Cellular Biology -Genetics, Islamic Azad University of Falavarjan, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohsen RashidiDepartment Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Asghar ArshiYoung Researchers and Elite Club, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Abbas Mokhtari-FarsaniNovin Genome (NG) Lab, Research and Development Center for Biotechnology, Shahrekord, Iran.
Shahrekord University · IRBiotechnology Research Center · IRIslamic Azad University of Falavarjan · IRIslamic Azad University of Najafabad · IRIslamic Azad University of Shahrekord · IRMazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Bahonar University of Kerman · IRShiraz University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR system is a revolutionary genome editing tool that has the potential to revolutionize the field of cancer research and therapy. The ability to precisely target and edit specific genetic mutations that drive the growth and spread of tumors has opened up new possibilities for the development of more effective and personalized cancer treatments. In this review, we will discuss the different CRISPR-based strategies that have been proposed for cancer therapy, including inactivating genes that drive tumor growth, enhancing the immune response to cancer cells, repairing genetic mutations that cause cancer, and delivering cancer-killing molecules directly to tumor cells. We will also summarize the current state of preclinical studies and clinical trials of CRISPR-based cancer therapy, highlighting the most promising results and the challenges that still need to be overcome. Safety and delivery are also important challenges for CRISPR-based cancer therapy to become a viable clinical option. We will discuss the challenges and limitations that need to be overcome, such as off-target effects, safety, and delivery to the tumor site. Finally, we will provide an overview of the current challenges and opportunities in the field of CRISPR-based cancer therapy and discuss future directions for research and development. The CRISPR system has the potential to change the landscape of cancer research, and this review aims to provide an overview of the current state of the field and the challenges that need to be overcome to realize this potential.

Indexed as

Gene EditingNeoplasmsHumansMutationCancer-killing moleculesCancer therapyClinical trialsCRISPR systemDeliveryGenetic mutationsGenome editingImmune responseOff-target effectsPreclinical studiesSafetyTumor growth

Identifiers

PMID38195537
PMCPMC10775503
OpenAlexW4390732271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.