ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2024
Perceived barriers and opportunities to improve working conditions and staff retention in emergency departments: a qualitative study.
Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Job burnout and work-family conflict among emergency nurses in China: a cross-sectional study based on the job demands-resources model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The relationship between work-family conflict and occupational stress in emergency department nurses: a cross-sectional correlational study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Occupational radiation safety and sustainable workforce management in PET/CT practice: a pilot study of healthcare professionals in a newly established cyclotron-based nuclear medicine center.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Moral distress in emergency nurses: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Relationship between workplace violence and depressive symptoms among emergency department physicians in China: the mediating role of occupational burnout.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Faculty development committee: Evolution through engagement and empowerment.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Psychosocial working conditions and violence prevention climate in German emergency departments - a cross-sectional study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of effort-reward imbalance on emergency nurses' health: a mediating and moderating role of emotional exhaustion and work-family conflict.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Leadership training in emergency medicine: A national survey.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Tailored leadership training in emergency medicine: qualitative exploration of the impact of the EMLeaders programme on consultants and trainees in England.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2024Article
- Trauma systems in high socioeconomic index countries in 2050.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStaff retention in Emergency Medicine (EM) is at crisis level and could be attributed in some part to adverse working conditions. This study aimed to better understand current concerns relating to working conditions and working practices in Emergency Departments (EDs).
methodsA qualitative approach was taken, using focus groups with ED staff (doctors, nurses, advanced care practitioners) of all grades, seniority and professional backgrounds from across the UK. Snowball recruitment was undertaken using social media and Royal College of Emergency Medicine communication channels. Focus group interviews were conducted online and organised by profession. A semi-structured topic guide was used to explore difficulties in the work environment, impact of these difficulties, barriers and priorities for change. Data were analysed using a directive content analysis to identify common themes.
resultsOf the 116 clinical staff who completed the eligibility and consent forms, 46 met criteria and consented, of those, 33 participants took part. Participants were predominantly white British (85%), females (73%) and doctors (61%). Four key themes were generated: 'culture of blame and negativity', 'untenable working environments', 'compromised leadership' and 'striving for support'. Data pertaining to barriers and opportunities for change were identified as sub-themes. In particular, strong leadership emerged as a key driver of change across all aspects of working practices.
conclusionThis study identified four key themes related to workplace concerns and their associated barriers and opportunities for change. Culture, working environment and need for support echoed current narratives across healthcare settings. Leadership emerged more prominently than in prior studies as both a barrier and opportunity for well-being and retention in the EM workplace. Further work is needed to develop leadership skills early on in clinical training, ensure protected time to deliver the role, ongoing opportunities to refine leadership skills and a clear pathway to address higher levels of management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.