ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2024
Vagus nerve stimulation in medically refractory epilepsy: Adverse effects and clinical correlates.
Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation and vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the frequency of adverse effects among pediatric and adult patients and the clinical variables associated with a higher probability of developing side effects.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled pediatric and adult patients who underwent Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) implantation at our institution and had documented follow-up during clinic visits for at least 6 months after implantation. Data collected included demographic information, epilepsy diagnosis, and device data.
resultsA total of 43 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who received a VNS device at our institution were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 12 months. Fourteen patients (32.55%) reported no side effects from VNS therapy. Side effects ranged from mild to severe, with significant side effects observed in 8 patients. Data on therapy efficacy were collected, and 10 patients (23.26%) reported no change in seizure frequency following device implantation.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that VNS is an important adjunct treatment option for epilepsy patients. Dysphagia and dyspnea can be significant adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation, aspiration pneumonia, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and prolonged hospital stay. These effects are more frequent in patients with symptomatic generalized epilepsy, global developmental delay at baseline, previous ICU admissions, abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging findings, and seizures with multiple semiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.