Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38194910›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cell2024

Temporal regulation of vegetative phase change in plants.

R Scott Poethig, Jim Fouracre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Heterochronic shifts in a timing-keeping microRNA are associated with multiple instances of neoteny in plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R Scott PoethigDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: spoethig@sas.upenn.edu.
Jim FouracreSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.

Funding

Regulation of a developmental clock in ArabidopsisR01GM051893 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI POETHIG, RICHARD SCOTT · 1995 to 2024
$7.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051893NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM51893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During their vegetative growth, plants reiteratively produce leaves, buds, and internodes at the apical end of the shoot. The identity of these organs changes as the shoot develops. Some traits change gradually, but others change in a coordinated fashion, allowing shoot development to be divided into discrete juvenile and adult phases. The transition between these phases is called vegetative phase change. Historically, vegetative phase change has been studied because it is thought to be associated with an increase in reproductive competence. However, this is not true for all species; indeed, heterochronic variation in the timing of vegetative phase change and flowering has made important contributions to plant evolution. In this review, we describe the molecular mechanism of vegetative phase change, how the timing of this process is controlled by endogenous and environmental factors, and its ecological and evolutionary significance.

Indexed as

AxonsRegenerationAdultHumansPhenotypePlant LeavesReproductionArabidopsisdevelopmental timingflowering timeheterochronyleaf developmentmaizemiR156miR172shoot developmentSPL genesvegetative phase change

Identifiers

PMID38194910
PMCPMC10783531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.