Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38194767›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2024

Rank acquisition impact on radiomics estimation (AсquIRE) in chest CT imaging: A retrospective multi-site, multi-use-case study.

Dmitry Cherezov, Vidya Sankar Viswanathan, Pingfu Fu, Amit Gupta, Anant Madabhushi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dmitry CherezovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vidya Sankar ViswanathanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pingfu FuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Amit GuptaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Anant MadabhushiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: anant.madabhushi@emory.edu.
Emory University · USCase Western Reserve University · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

Pathology CoreU54CA254566 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSON, STANTON L. · 2020 to 2024
$5.0M
Computer-Assisted Histologic Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft RejectionR01HL151277 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, MARGULIES, KENNETH BER · 2020 to 2023
$3.2M
Oral Cavity Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (OHbIC) in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OC-SCC)R01CA249992 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, JAMES, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Prostate cancer risk stratification via computational 3D pathologyR01CA268207 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jonathan T.C. Liu, Anant Madabhushi · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Prognostic and Predictive Digital Tissue Image Assay for Prostate CancerR01CA268287 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, SHILPA, LAL, PRITI · 2022 to 2025
$3.0M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
RADIOMIC APPROACHES TO IMPROVE TARGETING FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION CATHETER ABLATIONR01HL158071 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARNARD, JOHN, CHUNG, MINA KAY · 2021 to 2024
$2.9M
Novel Radiomics for Predicting Response to Immunotherapy for Lung CancerR01CA257612 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Anant Madabhushi, Vamsidhar Velcheti · 2021 to 2026
$2.7M
An AI-enabled Digital Pathology Platform for Multi-Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis and Prediction of Therapeutic BenefitU01CA269181 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Anant Madabhushi, tanuja shet · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
BLRD VA I01 BX004121BLRD VA IK6 BX006185CSRD VA I01 CX002622NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249992NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257612NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268207NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268287NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248226NCI NIH HHS U01 CA269181NCI NIH HHS U54 CA254566NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151277NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158071NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB028736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiomics is a method within medical image analysis that involves the extraction of quantitative data from radiologic scans, often in conjunction with machine learning algorithms to phenotype disease appearance, prognosticate disease outcome, and predict treatment response. However, variance in CT scanner acquisition parameters, such as convolution kernels or pixel spacing, can impact radiomics texture feature values. PURPOSE: The extent to which the parameters influence radiomics features continues to be an active area of investigation. In this study, we describe a novel approach, Acquisition Impact on Radiomics Estimation (AcquIRE), to rank the impact of CT acquisition parameters on radiomic texture features.

methodsIn this work, we used three chest CT imaging datasets (n = 749 patients) from nine sites comprising: i) lung granulomas and adenocarcinomas (D1) (10 and 52 patients, respectively); ii) minimal and frank invasive adenocarcinoma (D2) (74 and 145 patients); and iii) early-stage NSCLC patients (D3) (315 patients). Datasets D2 and D3 were collected from four sites each, and D1 from a single site. For each patient, 744 texture features and nine acquisition parameters were extracted and utilized to evaluate which parameters impact radiomic features the most. The AcquIRE method establishes a relative assessment between acquisition parameters and radiomic texture featuresa through the creation of a classification model, which is then utilized to assess the rank of the acquisition parameters.

resultsAcross the use cases, CT software version and convolution kernel parameters were found to have the most variance. In D1, it was observed that the Haralick texture feature family was the least affected by variations in acquisition parameters, while the Gabor feature family was the most impacted. However, in datasets D2 and D3, the Gabor features were found to be the least affected. Our findings suggest that the impact on radiomic parameters is as much a function of the problem in question as it is acquisition parameters.

conclusionsThe software version and convolution kernel parameters impacted the radiomics feature the most.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcquisition parametersComputed tomographyFeatures stabilityRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38194767
PMCPMC10872259
OpenAlexW4390145965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.