Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38194762›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024

Highly efficient free-breathing 3D whole-heart imaging in 3-min: single center study in adults with congenital heart disease.

Anastasia Fotaki, Kuberan Pushparajah, Christopher Rush, Camila Munoz, Carlos Velasco, Radhouene Neji, Karl P Kunze, René M Botnar, Claudia Prieto

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automated magnetic resonance angiography measurements of the thoracic aorta using commercial software.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anastasia FotakiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anastasia.fotaki@kcl.ac.uk.
Kuberan PushparajahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher RushGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Camila MunozDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom.
Carlos VelascoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom.
Radhouene NejiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom; MR Research Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Limited, Frimley, United Kingdom.
Karl P KunzeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom; MR Research Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare Limited, Frimley, United Kingdom.
René M BotnarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom; Escuela de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering, Santiago, Chile; Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstrasse 2 a, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
Claudia PrietoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, United Kingdom; Escuela de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/59/33955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree dimensional, whole-heart (3DWH) MRI is an established non-invasive imaging modality in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) for the diagnosis of cardiovascular morphology and for clinical decision making. Current techniques utilise diaphragmatic navigation (dNAV) for respiratory motion correction and gating and are frequently limited by long acquisition times. This study proposes and evaluates the diagnostic performance of a respiratory gating-free framework, which considers respiratory image-based navigation (iNAV), and highly accelerated variable density Cartesian sampling in concert with non-rigid motion correction and low-rank patch-based denoising (iNAV-3DWH-PROST). The method is compared to the clinical dNAV-3DWH sequence in adult patients with CHD.

methodsIn this prospective single center study, adult patients with CHD who underwent the clinical dNAV-3DWH MRI were also scanned with the iNAV-3DWH-PROST. Diagnostic confidence (4-point Likert scale) and diagnostic accuracy for common cardiovascular lesions was assessed by three readers. Scan times and diagnostic confidence were compared using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Co-axial vascular dimensions at three anatomic landmarks were measured, and agreement between the research and the corresponding clinical sequence was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsThe study included 60 participants (mean age ± [SD]: 33 ± 14 years; 36 men). The mean acquisition time of iNAV-3DWH-PROST was significantly lower compared with the conventional clinical sequence (3.1 ± 0.9 min vs 13.9 ± 3.9 min, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic confidence was higher for the iNAV-3DWH-PROST sequence compared with the clinical sequence (3.9 ± 0.2 vs 3.4 ± 0.8, p < 0.001), however there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy. Narrow limits of agreement and mean bias less than 0.08 cm were found between the research and the clinical vascular measurements.

conclusionsThe iNAV-3DWH-PROST framework provides efficient, high quality and robust 3D whole-heart imaging in significantly shorter scan time compared to the standard clinical sequence.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalImaging, Three-DimensionalPredictive Value of TestsAdultFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRespirationTime FactorsYoung Adult3D whole-heartCongenital heart diseaseINAVLow-rank

Identifiers

PMID38194762
PMCPMC11211218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.