ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024
Automatic Detection of Distant Metastasis Mentions in Radiology Reports in Spanish.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of Natural Language Processing Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Automated Extraction of Imaging and Pathology Data From Diverse Prostate Cancer Electronic Records.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Diagnosis extraction from unstructured Dutch echocardiogram reports using span- and document-level characteristic classification.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Developing and Validating an Automatic Support System for Tumor Coding in Pathology Reports in Spanish.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Automated Identification of Breast Cancer Relapse in Computed Tomography Reports Using Natural Language Processing.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA critical task in oncology is extracting information related to cancer metastasis from electronic health records. Metastasis-related information is crucial for planning treatment, evaluating patient prognoses, and cancer research. However, the unstructured way in which findings of distant metastasis are often written in radiology reports makes it difficult to extract information automatically. The main aim of this study was to extract distant metastasis findings from free-text imaging and nuclear medicine reports to classify the patient status according to the presence or absence of distant metastasis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe created a distant metastasis annotated corpus using positron emission tomography-computed tomography and computed tomography reports of patients with prostate, colorectal, and breast cancers. Entities were labeled M1 or M0 according to affirmative or negative metastasis descriptions. We used a named entity recognition model on the basis of a bidirectional long short-term memory model and conditional random fields to identify entities. Mentions were subsequently used to classify whole reports into M1 or M0.
resultsThe model detected distant metastasis mentions with a weighted average
conclusionThese results show the usefulness of the model in detecting distant metastasis findings in three different types of cancer and the consequent classification of reports. The relevance of this study is to generate structured distant metastasis information from free-text imaging reports in Spanish. In addition, the manually annotated corpus, annotation guidelines, and code are freely released to the research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.