ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2024
A Novel Dual Layer Cascade Reliability Framework for an Informed and Intuitive Clinician-AI Interaction In Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Polyps.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Diagnostic Technologies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Synthetic Data-augmented Explainable Vision Transformer for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis via Surface Tactile Imaging.Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Reliable machine learning models in genomic medicine using conformal prediction.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a novel Cascade Reliability Framework (CRF) that integrates two independent cascade layers of reliability (i.e., variational temperature scaling and conformal prediction) with a pre-trained Machine Learning (ML) model in order to provide clinicians with a more reliable and tunable tool for early-stage diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) polyps. The conformal prediction layer generates predictive sets that are guaranteed to contain the true polyp type with an adjustable error rate tuned by clinicians, while the confidence calibration generates meaningful confidence estimates for each predicted label. These two layers provide additional information and an error-tuning-ability for clinicians to assist them in making informed and intuitive decisions considering the outputs of the pre-trained ML model. Utilizing a novel vision-based tactile sensor and unique 3D-printed CRC polyp phantoms, we evaluated the trustworthiness of the proposed architecture and particularly dual outputs of four different types of CRF models, integrated with two different pre-trained ML models (i.e., ResNet18 and Dilated Residual Network) to highlight the model-agnostic feature of the architecture. To thoroughly assess the performance of the proposed approach, we used reliability diagrams and metrics such as accuracy, coverage, and average set size, while also addressing inter-class performance. Results demonstrate that the calibrated CRF models are well capable of handling non-ideal inputs with noise and blur. Moreover, using the conformal prediction with a user-defined error rate and various experiments, we show how clinicians can intuitively interact with a pre-trained ML model to make informed decisions and minimize the risk of CRC polyps misdiagnoses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.