Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38194231›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Organ Preservation and Survival by Clinical Response Grade in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the OPRA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hannah M Thompson, Dana M Omer, Sabrina Lin, Jin K Kim, Jonathan B Yuval, Floris S Verheij, Li-Xuan Qin, Marc J Gollub, Abraham Jing-Ching Wu, Meghan Lee and 14 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02008656 (A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating 3-year Disease Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision or Non-operative Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
28.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02008656 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating 3-year Disease Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision or Non-operative Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRan2013 to 2026Enrolled358ConditionsRectal CancerArmsOxaliplatin (OXAL), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin, Capecitabine (Xeloda®), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for localized rectal cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: where are we now, where do we go?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain: results from a national patterns-of-care survey by the SEOR-GI Group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah M ThompsonColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Dana M OmerColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sabrina LinDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jin K KimColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jonathan B YuvalColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Floris S VerheijColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Li-Xuan QinDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marc J GollubDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abraham Jing-Ching WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Meghan LeeColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sujata PatilDepartment of Quantitative Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Aram F HezelJames P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Jorge E MarcetDepartment of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Peter A CataldoDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington.
Blase N PoliteDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Daniel O HerzigDepartment of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
David LiskaDepartment of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Samuel OommenDepartment of Surgery, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, California.
Charles M FrielDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.
Charles A TernentDepartment of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Andrew L CovelerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Steven R HuntDepartment of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Julio Garcia-AguilarColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
OPRA Consortium
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USCHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy · USJohn Muir Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Vermont · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · USUniversity of Washington · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009501 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Babak J Mehrara · 1985 to 2026
$7.7M
Organ Preservation in Rectal AdenocarcinomaR01CA182551 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI GARCIA-AGUILAR, JULIO · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA182551NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Assessing clinical tumor response following completion of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is paramount to select patients for watch-and-wait treatment. Objective: To assess organ preservation (OP) and oncologic outcomes according to clinical tumor response grade. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma trial, a phase 2, nonblinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Randomization occurred between April 2014 and March 2020. Eligible participants included patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma. Data analysis occurred from March 2022 to July 2023. Intervention: Patients were randomized to induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed 8 (±4) weeks after TNT by digital rectal examination and endoscopy and categorized by clinical tumor response grade. A 3-tier grading schema that stratifies clinical tumor response into clinical complete response (CCR), near complete response (NCR), and incomplete clinical response (ICR) was devised to maximize patient eligibility for OP. Main Outcomes and Measures: OP and survival rates by clinical tumor response grade were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: There were 304 eligible patients, including 125 patients with a CCR (median [IQR] age, 60.6 [50.4-68.0] years; 76 male [60.8%]), 114 with an NCR (median [IQR] age, 57.6 [49.1-67.9] years; 80 male [70.2%]), and 65 with an ICR (median [IQR] age, 55.5 [47.7-64.2] years; 41 male [63.1%]) based on endoscopic imaging. Age, sex, tumor distance from the anal verge, pathological tumor classification, and clinical nodal classification were similar among the clinical tumor response grades. Median (IQR) follow-up for patients with OP was 4.09 (2.99-4.93) years. The 3-year probability of OP was 77% (95% CI, 70%-85%) for patients with a CCR and 40% (95% CI, 32%-51%) for patients with an NCR (P < .001). Clinical tumor response grade was associated with disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, most patients with a CCR after TNT achieved OP, with few developing tumor regrowth. Although the probability of tumor regrowth was higher for patients with an NCR compared with patients with a CCR, a significant proportion of patients achieved OP. These findings suggest the 3-tier grading schema can be used to estimate recurrence and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who receive TNT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02008656.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRectal NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOrgan Preservation

Identifiers

PMID38194231
PMCPMC10777257
OpenAlexW4390730948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.