Trial reportJAMA network open2024
Organ Preservation and Survival by Clinical Response Grade in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the OPRA Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02008656 (A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating 3-year Disease Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision or Non-operative Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating 3-year Disease Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision or Non-operative Management
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative and oncological outcomes between local excision plus radiotherapy versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.ESMO open · 2026Pooled it
- SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for localized rectal cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Guideline
- Is radical surgery always necessary in early rectal cancer? A systematic review of randomised trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Watch-and-Wait strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without PD-1 inhibitors in MMR-proficient non-metastatic rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Compliance and Toxicity of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,168 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Stages I-III Deficient Mismatch Repair Colon Cancer: A Clinical Trial.Annals of surgery · 2026Trial
- Association of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes with Disease Recurrence and Organ Preservation in Patients with Distal Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.Annals of surgery · 2025Trial
- Survival among patients treated with total mesorectal excision or selective watch-and-wait after total neoadjuvant therapy: a pooled analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA randomized phase II trials.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: where are we now, where do we go?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Pre-operative endoscopic assessment and MRI as predictors of pathological complete response and long-term survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Paradigm Shifts in Perioperative Management of Colorectal Cancer: Personalization Based on Tumor Biology, Primary Site, and Recurrence Risk, and the Evolving Role of Organ Preservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain: results from a national patterns-of-care survey by the SEOR-GI Group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Four-Year Survival Outcomes of Personalized Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Chemotherapy During the 'Wait Period' Versus Standard Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Report from the 27th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference on Colorectal Cancer, Calgary, Alberta, 26-27 September 2025: Advances in Colon and Rectal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Real-World Tumor Response and Clinical Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Watch and Wait Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Update From Results of Recent Clinical Trials.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedError in Byline.2024
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Assessing clinical tumor response following completion of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is paramount to select patients for watch-and-wait treatment. Objective: To assess organ preservation (OP) and oncologic outcomes according to clinical tumor response grade. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Patients with Rectal Adenocarcinoma trial, a phase 2, nonblinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Randomization occurred between April 2014 and March 2020. Eligible participants included patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma. Data analysis occurred from March 2022 to July 2023. Intervention: Patients were randomized to induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed 8 (±4) weeks after TNT by digital rectal examination and endoscopy and categorized by clinical tumor response grade. A 3-tier grading schema that stratifies clinical tumor response into clinical complete response (CCR), near complete response (NCR), and incomplete clinical response (ICR) was devised to maximize patient eligibility for OP. Main Outcomes and Measures: OP and survival rates by clinical tumor response grade were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: There were 304 eligible patients, including 125 patients with a CCR (median [IQR] age, 60.6 [50.4-68.0] years; 76 male [60.8%]), 114 with an NCR (median [IQR] age, 57.6 [49.1-67.9] years; 80 male [70.2%]), and 65 with an ICR (median [IQR] age, 55.5 [47.7-64.2] years; 41 male [63.1%]) based on endoscopic imaging. Age, sex, tumor distance from the anal verge, pathological tumor classification, and clinical nodal classification were similar among the clinical tumor response grades. Median (IQR) follow-up for patients with OP was 4.09 (2.99-4.93) years. The 3-year probability of OP was 77% (95% CI, 70%-85%) for patients with a CCR and 40% (95% CI, 32%-51%) for patients with an NCR (P < .001). Clinical tumor response grade was associated with disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, most patients with a CCR after TNT achieved OP, with few developing tumor regrowth. Although the probability of tumor regrowth was higher for patients with an NCR compared with patients with a CCR, a significant proportion of patients achieved OP. These findings suggest the 3-tier grading schema can be used to estimate recurrence and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who receive TNT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02008656.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.