ArticleBrain informatics2024
Deep learning based joint fusion approach to exploit anatomical and functional brain information in autism spectrum disorders.
Article in Brain informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Data-Driven Approaches for Autism Detection: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Algorithms and Datasets.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Contrastive and Transfer Learning for Aligned Multimodal Neuroimaging Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Cross-attention-guided subject-adaptive graph learning for multimodal autism classification: integrating structural and functional MRI data.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- Metaheuristic hyperparameter optimization of deep neural networks for demographic-aware autism spectrum disorder classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Construction of a small-sample brain imaging data augmentation and explainable diagnostic model for autism based on generative adversarial networks.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- An automated detection system of autism spectrum disorder using meta-heuristic approach of adaptive LSTM with bayesian learning technique.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- An Explainable Deep Learning Framework for Multimodal Autism Diagnosis Using XAI GAMI-Net and Hypernetworks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Special Education Professionals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Regarding the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- GM-VGG-Net: A Gray Matter-Based Deep Learning Network for Autism Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Autism Data Classification Using AI Algorithms with Rules: Focused Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Abnormal multimodal neuroimaging patterns associated with social deficits in male autism spectrum disorder.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of the information encoded in multiparametric MRI images can enhance the performance of machine-learning classifiers. In this study, we investigate whether the combination of structural and functional MRI might improve the performances of a deep learning (DL) model trained to discriminate subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) with respect to typically developing controls (TD). MATERIAL AND
methodsWe analyzed both structural and functional MRI brain scans publicly available within the ABIDE I and II data collections. We considered 1383 male subjects with age between 5 and 40 years, including 680 subjects with ASD and 703 TD from 35 different acquisition sites. We extracted morphometric and functional brain features from MRI scans with the Freesurfer and the CPAC analysis packages, respectively. Then, due to the multisite nature of the dataset, we implemented a data harmonization protocol. The ASD vs. TD classification was carried out with a multiple-input DL model, consisting in a neural network which generates a fixed-length feature representation of the data of each modality (FR-NN), and a Dense Neural Network for classification (C-NN). Specifically, we implemented a joint fusion approach to multiple source data integration. The main advantage of the latter is that the loss is propagated back to the FR-NN during the training, thus creating informative feature representations for each data modality. Then, a C-NN, with a number of layers and neurons per layer to be optimized during the model training, performs the ASD-TD discrimination. The performance was evaluated by computing the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve within a nested 10-fold cross-validation. The brain features that drive the DL classification were identified by the SHAP explainability framework.
resultsThe AUC values of 0.66±0.05 and of 0.76±0.04 were obtained in the ASD vs. TD discrimination when only structural or functional features are considered, respectively. The joint fusion approach led to an AUC of 0.78±0.04. The set of structural and functional connectivity features identified as the most important for the two-class discrimination supports the idea that brain changes tend to occur in individuals with ASD in regions belonging to the Default Mode Network and to the Social Brain.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that the multimodal joint fusion approach outperforms the classification results obtained with data acquired by a single MRI modality as it efficiently exploits the complementarity of structural and functional brain information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.