ArticleBiomedical microdevices2024
A multiplexed microfluidic continuous-flow electroporation system for efficient cell transfection.
Article in Biomedical microdevices, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A critical review of microfluidic electroporation for therapeutic cell engineering.Cell reports. Physical science · 2026Article
- Integrated Size-Selective Cell Purification and Electroporation for Genetic Manipulation of Primary Cells.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Microfluidics for cell therapy and manufacturing in oncology and regenerative medicine.Lab on a chip · 2026Review
- Microfluidic Platforms for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Gene Therapy.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular therapies have the potential to advance treatment for a broad array of diseases but rely on viruses for genetic reprogramming. The time and cost required to produce viruses has created a bottleneck that constricts development of and access to cellular therapies. Electroporation is a non-viral alternative for genetic reprogramming that bypasses these bottlenecks, but current electroporation technology suffers from low throughput, tedious optimization, and difficulty scaling to large-scale cell manufacturing. Here, we present an adaptable microfluidic electroporation platform with the capability for rapid, multiplexed optimization with 96-well plates. Once parameters are optimized using small volumes of cells, transfection can be seamlessly scaled to high-volume cell manufacturing without re-optimization. We demonstrate optimizing transfection of plasmid DNA to Jurkat cells, screening hundreds of different electrical waveforms of varying shapes at a speed of ~3 s per waveform using ~20 µL of cells per waveform. We selected an optimal set of transfection parameters using a low-volume flow cell. These parameters were then used in a separate high-volume flow cell where we obtained similar transfection performance by design. This demonstrates an alternative non-viral and economical transfection method for scaling to the volume required for producing a cell therapy without sacrificing performance. Importantly, this transfection method is disease-agnostic with broad applications beyond cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38194117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.