Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38194103›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Orbital tumors].

F Austein, M Huhndorf, P Papanagiotou

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F AusteinKlinik für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Sankt-Jürgen-Str. 1, 28205, Bremen, Deutschland. friederike.austein@gesundheitnord.de.
M HuhndorfKlinik für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
P PapanagiotouAretaieion Universitätsklinkum für Radiologie, Universität von Athen, Athen, Griechenland.
Klinikum Bremen-Mitte · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orbital tumours include a variety of orbital diseases of different origins. In the case of malignant orbital tumours, early detection is important so that treatment can be initiated promptly. Neuroradiological imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plays an important role in the diagnostic of orbital tumours. In adults, lymphoproliferative diseases, inflammations and secondary orbital tumours are most frequently found, whereas in children mostly dermoid cysts, optic gliomas and capillary haemangiomas are found. Optic glioma is a pilocytic astrocytoma and accounts for two thirds of all primary optic tumours. Optic nerve sheath meningiomas mostly affect middle-aged women. In childhood, retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular tumour. This is an aggressive malignant tumour which can occur unilaterally or bilaterally. Based on the imaging findings, differential diagnoses can usually be easily narrowed down using criteria such as age of manifestation, frequency, localisation and imaging characteristics.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsOptic Nerve GliomaOptic Nerve NeoplasmsOrbital DiseasesOrbital NeoplasmsRetinal NeoplasmsAdultChildFemaleHumansMiddle AgedDifferential diagnosesMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasms of the orbitNeuroradiological examinationOphthalmology

Identifiers

PMID38194103
OpenAlexW4390774916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.