ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024
Using Vision Transformer for high robustness and generalization in predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of machine learning-based radiomics models for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma in Chinese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating lipid metabolite analysis with MRI-based transformer and radiomics for early and late stage prediction of oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung adenocarcinoma is a common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and accurate EGFR genotyping is crucial for optimal treatment outcomes. Conventional methods for identifying the EGFR genotype have several limitations. Therefore, we proposed a deep learning model using non-invasive CT images to predict EGFR mutation status with robustness and generalizability.
methodsA total of 525 patients were enrolled at the local hospital to serve as the internal data set for model training and validation. In addition, a cohort of 30 patients from the publicly available Cancer Imaging Archive Data Set was selected for external testing. All patients underwent plain chest CT, and their EGFR mutation status labels were categorized as either mutant or wild type. The CT images were analyzed using a self-attention-based ViT-B/16 model to predict the EGFR mutation status, and the model's performance was evaluated. To produce an attention map indicating the suspicious locations of EGFR mutations, Grad-CAM was utilized.
resultsThe ViT deep learning model achieved impressive results, with an accuracy of 0.848, an AUC of 0.868, a sensitivity of 0.924, and a specificity of 0.718 on the validation cohort. Furthermore, in the external test cohort, the model achieved comparable performances, with an accuracy of 0.833, an AUC of 0.885, a sensitivity of 0.900, and a specificity of 0.800.
conclusionsThe ViT model demonstrates a high level of accuracy in predicting the EGFR mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma patients. Moreover, with the aid of attention maps, the model can assist clinicians in making informed clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.