ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2024
[The impact of the Ahr Valley flood on the health of the local population - an analysis based on SHI routine data].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Crisis resilience in medical practices and clinics].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent decades, Germany has experienced flood events that posed a threat to the health of the local population. However, there is a paucity of studies on the health consequences of these events. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the health consequences of the Ahr Valley flood in 2021.
methodsThe data basis of this longitudinal study are nationwide billing data (inpatient/outpatient) of the BKK-Landesverband Nordwest. The study region was Ahrweiler and the study periods were the third quarters of 2020 and 2021. Among other things, prevalence rate ratio tests were used to determine which diagnoses (inpatient/outpatient) were spatially and temporally associated with the flood event on the basis of ICD-10 coding.
resultsThe results show a significant increase in billed services for some diagnosis groups in the inpatient sector. In particular, there was an increase in F diagnoses (mental and behavioural disorders), S diagnoses (injuries) and various diagnosis codes within Z codes (factors influencing health status and leading to healthcare utilisation). In the outpatient sector, a decrease was observed in many diagnosis groups (F and Z diagnoses).
conclusionThe results of the study showed that the mental health of the local population was particularly affected by the floods. Healthcare was also affected. As floods are expected to become more frequent and severe in the future, measures to protect the population and health infrastructure need to be adapted accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.