ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023
Performance and safety of temperature- and flow-controlled radiofrequency ablation for ventricular arrhythmia.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulsed Field Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Pooled it
- Ablation Methods and Catheter Settings for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A Bench to Bedside Review: Part 1.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- Epicardial ventricular arrhythmia ablation: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsHigh-power ablation is effective for ventricular arrhythmia ablation; however, it increases the risk of steam pops. The aim of this study was to define the safety and efficacy of QMODE ablation in the ventricle and the risk of steam pop. METHODS AND
resultsConsecutive patients undergoing ventricular ablation using QDOT were included in a prospective single-centre registry. Procedural data, complications, and follow-up were systematically analysed and compared with a historical ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC) cohort ablated using STSF. QMODE (≤50 W) ablation was performed in 107 patients [age 62 ± 13 years; 76% male; VT (n = 41); PVC (n = 66)]. A total of 2456 applications were analysed [power: 45.9 ± 5.0 W with minimal power titration (90% > 95% max power); duration 26 ± 8 s; impedance drop 9.4 ± 4.7 Ω; ablation index: 569 ± 163; mean-max temperature 44.3 ± 2.6°C]. Ventricular tachycardia ablation was associated with shorter radiofrequency (RF) time and a trend towards shorter procedure times using QDOT (QDOT vs. STSF: 20.1 ± 14.7 vs. 31 ± 17 min; P = 0.002, 151 ± 59 vs. 172 ± 48 min; P = 0.06). Complications, VT recurrence, and mortality rates were comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 2% vs. 2%; P = 0.9, 24% vs. 27%; P = 0.82, and 2% vs. 4%; P = 0.67). Five audible steam pops (0.02%) occurred. Premature ventricular complex ablation was associated with comparable RF and procedure times (QDOT vs. STSF: 4.8 ± 4.6 vs. 3.9 ± 3.1 min; P = 0.25 and 96.1 ± 31.9 vs. 94.6 ± 24.7 min; P = 0.75). Complication and PVC recurrence were also comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 0% vs. 3%; P = 0.17 and 19% vs. 22%; P = 0.71).
conclusionVentricular ablation using QMODE ≤ 50 W is safe and effective for both VT and PVC ablation and is associated with a low risk for steam pop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.