ArticleAnesthesiology2024
Discovering the Clinical Relevance of Heart-Lung Interactions.
Article in Anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tidal Volume Challenge to Assess Volume Responsiveness with Dynamic Preload Indices During Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In 1978, Dr. Pinsky's scientific career became firmly directed toward understanding the deeper meaning of heart-lung interactions. This would define his focus for the next 45 yr. At the time, he and colleagues studied the effects of changes in intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular performance in humans, documenting that the primary effect of large negative swings in intrathoracic pressure was to increase left ventricular transmural ejection pressure, and thus left ventricular afterload, selectively. They concluded that large intrathoracic pressure changes directly influence cardiac performance. This fundamental observation was followed by many additional observations in both highly invasive animal studies supported by less invasive clinical studies, which showed that intrathoracic pressure-induced changes in the gradients for venous return to the heart and left ventricular ejection from the heart disproportionately affected both right ventricular and left ventricular function. The direct clinical implications of these results form the rationale for use of continuous positive airway pressure as a primary treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and immediate endotracheal intubation for acute upper airway obstruction. These findings subsequently led to the practical use of dynamic changes in left ventricular stroke volume and the associated arterial pulse pressure during positive-pressure ventilation to identify volume responsiveness and, thus, to personalize resuscitation efforts in the treatment of acute cardiovascular insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.