Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38193680›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2024

Predicting fungal secondary metabolite activity from biosynthetic gene cluster data using machine learning.

Olivia Riedling, Allison S Walker, Antonis Rokas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decoding the rhizosphere microbiome againstFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Computational Approaches for Discovering Virulence Factors inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Primed for Discovery.Biochemistry · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olivia RiedlingDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-0513
Allison S WalkerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Antonis RokasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-6551
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Deciphering the phenotypic and genomic traits that underlie the evolution of pathogenicity differences among Aspergillus fumigatus and its close relativesR01AI153356 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Antonis Rokas · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Machine learning approaches for the discovery, repurposing, and optimization of natural products with therapeutic potential - Supplement to support grad training of Adrian RussR35GM146987 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Allison Sara Walker · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI153356NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal secondary metabolites (SMs) contribute to the diversity of fungal ecological communities, niches, and lifestyles. Many fungal SMs have one or more medically and industrially important activities (e.g., antifungal, antibacterial, and antitumor). The genes necessary for fungal SM biosynthesis are typically located right next to each other in the genome and are known as biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). However, whether fungal SM bioactivity can be predicted from specific attributes of genes in BGCs remains an open question. We adapted machine learning models that predicted SM bioactivity from bacterial BGC data with accuracies as high as 80% to fungal BGC data. We trained our models to predict the antibacterial, antifungal, and cytotoxic/antitumor bioactivity of fungal SMs on two data sets: (i) fungal BGCs (data set comprised of 314 BGCs) and (ii) fungal (314 BGCs) and bacterial BGCs (1,003 BGCs). We found that models trained on fungal BGCs had balanced accuracies between 51% and 68%, whereas training on bacterial and fungal BGCs had balanced accuracies between 56% and 68%. The low prediction accuracy of fungal SM bioactivities likely stems from the small size of the data set; this lack of data, coupled with our finding that including bacterial BGC data in the training data did not substantially change accuracies currently limits the application of machine learning approaches to fungal SM studies. With >15,000 characterized fungal SMs, millions of putative BGCs in fungal genomes, and increased demand for novel drugs, efforts that systematically link fungal SM bioactivity to BGCs are urgently needed.IMPORTANCEFungi are key sources of natural products and iconic drugs, including penicillin and statins. DNA sequencing has revealed that there are likely millions of biosynthetic pathways in fungal genomes, but the chemical structures and bioactivities of >99% of natural products produced by these pathways remain unknown. We used artificial intelligence to predict the bioactivities of diverse fungal biosynthetic pathways. We found that the accuracies of our predictions were generally low, between 51% and 68%, likely because the natural products and bioactivities of only very few fungal pathways are known. With >15,000 characterized fungal natural products, millions of putative biosynthetic pathways present in fungal genomes, and increased demand for novel drugs, our study suggests that there is an urgent need for efforts that systematically identify fungal biosynthetic pathways, their natural products, and their bioactivities.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiological ProductsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArtificial IntelligenceBiosynthetic PathwaysGenome, FungalMachine LearningMultigene FamilyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsBiological Productsantibacterialantibioticantifungalantitumorartificial intelligencebioactivitycytotoxicdrugfungisecondary metabolismspecialized metabolism

Identifiers

PMID38193680
PMCPMC10846162
OpenAlexW4390783150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.