ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
Rectal deformation management with IGRT in prostate radiotherapy: Can it be managed with rigid alignment alone?
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From CBCT to MR-Linac in Image-Guided Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Towards Treatment Personalization.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Can the Dose Constraints Be Trusted? Actual Dose Exposure of Bladder and Rectum During Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2025Article
- Rectal deformation management with IGRT in prostate radiotherapy: Can it be managed with rigid alignment alone?Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIt is challenging to achieve appropriate target coverage of the prostate with Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) while simultaneously constraining rectal doses within planned values when there is significant variability in rectal filling and shape. We investigated if rectum planning goals can be fulfilled using rigid CBCT-based on-board alignment to account for interfraction rectal deformations.
methodsDelivered rectal doses corresponding to prostate alignment ("PR") and anterior rectum alignment ("AR") for 239 daily treatments from 13 patients are reported. Rectal doses were estimated by rigidly mapping the planned dose on the daily CT derived from the daily CBCT according to respective alignment shifts. Rectum V95% (rV95%) was used for analyses.
resultsCompared to "PR", "AR" alignment increased rV95% for an average of 34.4% across all patients. rV95% (cc) averaged over all fractions was significant from planning values for 10/13 patients for "PR" and for 9/13 for "AR". 3/13 patients had reproducible anatomy. Of patients with non-reproducible anatomy, three had dosimetrically more favorable, while seven had less favorable anatomies. Most shift differences (82.3%) between the "PR" and "AR" alignments larger than 2 mm resulted in rV95% changes larger than 2 cc. Most shift differences (82.2%) of 2 mm or less between the "PR" and "AR" alignments resulted in rV95% changes less than 2 cc. The average percentage of fractions among patients in which anterior or posterior shifts for "AR" and "PR" alignment was larger than the PTV margins was 9.1% (0.0%-37.5%) and 1.3% (0%-10%).
conclusionRectal deformation and subsequent inconsistent interfraction separation between prostate and rectal wall translate into anatomical changes that cannot always be mitigated with rigid alignment. If systematic differences exist due to a non-reproducible planning anatomy, attempts to restore the planned rectal doses through anterior rectum alignment produce rather small improvements and may result in unacceptable target underdosage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.