ArticleInnovations in clinical neuroscience
Outpatient Pharmacogenomic Screenings to Prevent Addiction, Overdose, and Suicide.
Article in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CYP2C19 point-of-care testing: where are we now and where should we go?The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care genetic testing for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to improve psychiatric treatment in outpatient settings remains a challenge. The presence or absence of certain genomic alleles determines the activity of the encoded enzymes, which ultimately defines the individual's drug metabolism rate. Classification of poor metabolizers (PMs) and rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers (RMs/UMs) would facilitate personalization and precision of treatment. However, current pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing of multiple genes is comprehensive and requires quantitative analyses for interpretations. We recommend qualitative, fast-track, point-of-care screenings, which are one- or-two gene-based analyses, as a quick initial screening tool to potentially eliminate the need for an expensive quantitative send-out test, which is a costly and lengthy process. We speculate that these tests will be relevant in two major scenarios: 1) clinical psychiatry for treating disease states such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), where trial and error is still the mainstay of drug selection and symptom management, a process that is associated with significant delay in optimizing individualized treatment and dose, and thus response; and 2) pain management, where quickly determining an effective level of analgesia while avoiding a toxic level can cause a drastic improvement in mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38193100PMC10773601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.