Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38193059›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Guiding warfarin self-management in children: development of a warfarin nomogram.

Sophie Jones, Jodi Hislop, Ashleigh Allan, Adele Kuzmitsky, Michael Pham-Crepps, Anthea Greenway, Paul Monagle, Fiona Newall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie JonesThe University of Melbourne, Department of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia.
Jodi HislopMurdoch Children's Research of Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Ashleigh AllanThe University of Melbourne, Department of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia.
Adele KuzmitskyThe University of Melbourne, Department of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael Pham-CreppsThe University of Melbourne, Department of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia.
Anthea GreenwayMurdoch Children's Research of Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul MonagleMurdoch Children's Research of Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Fiona NewallThe University of Melbourne, Department of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia.
Royal Children's Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Warfarin therapy in children is impacted by many variables. To support the implementation of a self-management program within a pediatric anticoagulation service, a pediatric-specific warfarin nomogram was needed. A literature review revealed no published pediatric nomograms; therefore, a nomogram was developed drawing upon an evidence-based "Warfarin Information for Clinicians" hospital guideline. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of a pediatric warfarin nomogram. Methods: A retrospective audit of electronic medical records compared the dosing and international normalized ratio (INR) retest decisions made by hematology clinicians to the dosing and retesting recommended by a new warfarin nomogram at a pediatric hospital. Children (aged 6 months-18 years) receiving warfarin therapy for >6 months were included. Data were collected between September 2019 and February 2020. Descriptive data analysis was performed. The study was approved by the hospital's Human Research Ethics Committee. Results: Warfarin dosing and INR retest decisions for 39 children were included, equating to 521 INRs. The nomogram matched 81.4% of clinicians dosing decisions and 30% of INR retest decisions. Moreover, 59% of the clinician-recommended retest dates were earlier than the nomogram recommendation. In the INR 2.0-3.0 group, 84.4% of dosing decisions and 72% of retest decisions matched the nomogram. Conclusions: These results suggest that this pediatric nomogram is a suitable tool for warfarin dosing, as recommended warfarin doses matched the majority of clinicians' decisions. Modification may be needed to nomogram recommendations for the time to retest. This nomogram can be used to support warfarin self-management and may assist clinicians and patients or families in making evidence-based dosing decisions.

Indexed as

anticoagulantchildnomogramsself-managementwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID38193059
PMCPMC10772892
OpenAlexW4388571640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.