Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38193053›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Reassessment of dextran sulfate in anti-Xa assay for unfractionated heparin laboratory monitoring.

Michael Hardy, Julien Cabo, Antoine Deliège, Jonathan Douxfils, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Thomas Lecompte, François Mullier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Impact of Dextran Sulfate on Anti-Xa Assay Outcomes after Unfractionated Heparin Reversal by Excessive Protamine.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael HardyCHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium.
Julien CaboCHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium.
Antoine DeliègeCHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium.
Jonathan DouxfilsUniversity of Namur, Department of Pharmacy, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Namur, Belgium.
Isabelle Gouin-ThibaultCHU of Rennes, Department of Laboratory Hematology, IRSET-INSERM-1085, Rennes, France.
Thomas LecompteUniversity of Namur, Department of Pharmacy, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Namur, Belgium.
François MullierCHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium.
Namur Research Institute for Life SciencesInserm · FRUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anti-Xa assays are used for unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring. Dextran sulfate (DS) is used in some assays to overcome the artifactual preanalytical release of platelet factor 4. However, the practical implications of this test modification have not been studied extensively. Objectives: To investigate the impact of the presence of DS in the anti-Xa assay for UFH laboratory monitoring. Methods: We studied factor Xa inhibition, using an assay without DS (Stago Liquid Anti-Xa), in normal pool plasma spiked with various concentrations of UFH (up to 1 IU/mL) in the presence of increasing concentrations of DS (up to 2560 μg/mL). We also investigated the effect of DS on FXa inhibition measured after the addition of UFH and heparin antagonists (protamine and Polybrene; Sigma Aldrich). Eventually, we compared the anti-Xa levels measured using the assay without DS to those measured with an assay containing DS (BIOPHEN Heparin LRT, Hyphen BioMed). Results: DS per se had a detectable anti-Xa effect. FXa inhibition in UFH-spiked plasma linearly increased with increasing concentrations of added DS, with a plateau at approximately 160 μg/mL DS, at which the apparent anti-Xa level had almost doubled. In the presence of heparin antagonists, the addition of DS increased anti-Xa levels, corresponding to the dissociation of the UFH-antagonists complexes Conclusion: In the presence of high concentrations of DS, FXa inhibition was much higher than that predicted from added UFH amounts, presumably related to the greater availability of UFH for interaction with antithrombin. While the relevance of measuring this "masked" heparin has not been demonstrated, the presence of DS renders the result inaccurate in the presence of protamine or Polybrene.

Indexed as

anti-Xadextranheparinpolybreneprotamineunfractionated heparin

Identifiers

PMID38193053
PMCPMC10772882
OpenAlexW4388534276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.