SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023
Deep learning techniques for isointense infant brain tissue segmentation: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Baby Open Brains: An open-source dataset of infant brain segmentations.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Baby Open Brains: An Open-Source Repository of Infant Brain Segmentations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To improve comprehension of initial brain growth in wellness along with sickness, it is essential to precisely segment child brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM), along with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Nonetheless, in the isointense phase (6-8 months of age), the inborn myelination and development activities, WM along with GM display alike stages of intensity in both T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI, making tissue segmentation extremely difficult. Methods: The comprehensive review of studies related to isointense brain MRI segmentation approaches is highlighted in this publication. The main aim and contribution of this study is to aid researchers by providing a thorough review to make their search for isointense brain MRI segmentation easier. The systematic literature review is performed from four points of reference: (1) review of studies concerning isointense brain MRI segmentation; (2) research contribution and future works and limitations; (3) frequently applied evaluation metrics and datasets; (4) findings of this studies. Results and discussion: The systemic review is performed on studies that were published in the period of 2012 to 2022. A total of 19 primary studies of isointense brain MRI segmentation were selected to report the research question stated in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.