ArticleTranslational cancer research2023
A model for predicting clinical prognosis based on brain metastasis-related genes in patients with breast cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment and verification of a prognostic immune cell signature-based model for breast cancer overall survival.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain metastasis (BM) is a clinically relevant cause of death in patients with breast cancer (BRCA). This study was designed to develop a clinical model capable of predicting BRCA patients' prognostic outcomes according to the expression of BM-related genes (BMRGs). Methods: The public Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases served as data sources. BMRGs of BRCA were selected from previous literature. Differences among BRCA molecular subtypes were compared using R 'limma' package. The impact of BM-related differentially expressed genes (BM_DEGs) on BRCA patients' outcomes was explored with a risk score model, after which the relationship between these risk scores and immune cell infiltration was examined. Risk scores were also used to judge the predicted efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions. The utility of risk scores in combination with clinicopathological characteristics was evaluated as a predictor of patient's survival through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The R limma package was used to explore differential gene expression, after which 12 BM_DEGs were incorporated into a risk scoring model. The resultant risk scores were able to predict immunotherapeutic treatment efficacy. In addition, a nomogram incorporating risk scores, stage, and age was established. The nomogram was able to reliably predict the overall survival (OS) of BRCA patients, yielding predictive outcomes that aligned well with actual observations. Conclusions: In summary, a predictive clinical model for BRCA patients was successfully established in this study, providing a valuable tool that may be particularly helpful for the assessment of patients facing a risk of BM development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.