ArticleCureus2023
Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Injuries and Correlation With Arthroscopy Findings.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence revolution in shoulder magnetic resonance imaging: current evidence and future directions for rotator cuff diagnosis.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Patient-Level Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears on Shoulder MRI Using an Explainable Vision Transformer Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Shoulder Pain Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Emerging Trends.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rotator Cuff Tear Detection: A Systematic Review of MRI-Based Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Correlation of Preoperative MRI and Shoulder-Specific Tests With Intraoperative Findings in Rotator Cuff Tears.Cureus · 2025Article
- EVALUATION OF TENDON HEALING AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR OF ISOLATED SUPRASPINATUS TEARS.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe prevalent cause of shoulder pain is rotator cuff tears (RCT), which induce profound discomfort and morbidity. Hence, their detection and appropriate management become important to alleviate morbidity and enhance quality of life. Imaging has an important role in the diagnosis of such patients to guide for further management. A wide array of radiological approaches has been explored for the detection of RCT. The study aimed to assess the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of regular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and characterization of RCT and furthermore to link the results of MRI with the arthroscopy findings. The limitations and pitfalls if any with MRI patients presenting were also addressed. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was a diagnostic evaluation study conducted at the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Muslim Educational Society (MES) Medical College, Perinthalmanna, India, among individuals with RCT between December 1, 2015, and May 31, 2017. Patients who were referred for MRI and then taken up for arthroscopy were included. The findings for each tendon of rotator cuff on MRI were contrasted with that of arthroscopy, and the percentage of agreement was calculated. Additional findings relevant to the study were also noted. SN, SP, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI were determined by taking arthroscopic findings as the gold standard.
resultsThe study was comprised of 36 patients assessed using MRI and arthroscopy for RCT. The study participants ranged in age from 31 to 70 years, with a mean of 52.69±8.86 years. The majority of the patients (69.4%) were between the ages of 41 and 60 years. MRI had 100% SN and SP for full-thickness supraspinatus (SS) tear, 50% SN and 100% SP for partial-thickness SS tear, 100% SN and 80% SP for full-thickness infraspinatus (IS) tear, 75% SN and 80% SP for partial-thickness IS tear, and 95% SN and 86.6% SP for subscapularis (SC) tear.
conclusionThe MRI RCT investigation had a high SN, SP, and PPV compared to arthroscopy. The most frequently involved tendon reported in the present study was SS (n=35; 97.22%) followed by IS (n=32; 88.88%) and SC (n=22; 61.11%). The teres minor tendon was least commonly affected (n=0). Moreover, 61.11% (n=22) of the patients had joint effusion, 41.66% (n=15) had subacromial-subdeltoid bursal effusion, and 27.77% (n=10) had subcoracoid effusion, suggesting that RCT include joint effusion or bursal fluid. Acromioclavicular (AC) joint hypertrophy was found in 53% (n=19) of the patients, and 90% (n=17) were over 45 years old, indicating an association between age, AC joint hypertrophy, and RCT. Therefore, MRI has a good SN and SP for detecting various RCT. Therefore, it could be used to investigate a suspected RCT and should be considered a near-reference standard to arthroscopy for RCT diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.