Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38192958›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Past and Present of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS): A Narrative Review.

Nikhila Chelikam, Ankit Vyas, Rutikbhai Desai, Nida Khan, Karanrajsinh Raol, Anusha Kavarthapu, Prahasith Kamani, Garad Ibrahim, Sowmya Madireddy, Suveenkrishna Pothuru and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Implementing point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in UK primary care: current and future perspectives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Undergraduate Medical Education: A National Survey.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Assessing Point-of-care Ultrasound Knowledge and Utilization among Emergency Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Survey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikhila ChelikamClinical Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Ankit VyasInternal Medicine, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beaumont, USA.
Rutikbhai DesaiCommunity Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND.
Nida KhanInternal Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, PAK.
Karanrajsinh RaolInternal Medicine, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, USA.
Anusha KavarthapuInternal Medicine, Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, USA.
Prahasith KamaniInternal Medicine, Gandhi Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Garad IbrahimInternal Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, USA.
Sowmya MadireddyInternal Medicine, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, IND.
Suveenkrishna PothuruInternal Medicine, Ascension Via Christi Hospital, Manhattan, USA.
Parth ShahHospital Medicine, Tower Health Medical Group, Reading, USA.
Urvish K PatelPublic Health and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Gandhi Medical College & Hospital · INIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USAscension Via Christi Hospital · USGujarat Cancer Society · INHennepin County Medical Center · USJinnah Sindh Medical University · PKMamata Medical College · INReading Hospital · USRichmond University Medical Center · USSaint Thomas Midtown Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to conduct a literature review to gain insight into point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS). PoCUS is a rapid, accurate, non-invasive, and radiation-free imaging modality that can be used in stable and unstable patients. PoCUS can be performed parallel to physical examination, resuscitation, and stabilization; repeated exams in critical patients are essential for improving sensitivity. The review highlights how PoCUS, which was initially used to detect free intraperitoneal fluid in trauma patients, has developed into a life-saving diagnostic tool that could be utilized by treating physicians during various stages of diagnosis, resuscitation, operation, and postoperative critical care when managing sick patients. The review also notes the barriers to the widespread uptake of PoCUS in general internal medicine and the recent commercial availability of "pocket" or handheld probes that have made PoCUS more readily available. This review concludes that adopting a focused binary decision-making approach can maximize PoCUS's value in many clinical settings, including emergency departments, intensive care units, and operation theatres. Overall, the review emphasizes the importance of awareness of common indications, limitations, and strengths of this evolving and promising technology to determine its future trajectory: Providing comprehensive PoCUS training within internal medicine curriculums and supporting trainers to do so.

Indexed as

covid-19pocus in inpatient settingpocus in outpatient settingpocus (point of care ultrasound)ultrasound guided imagingultrasound types

Identifiers

PMID38192958
PMCPMC10771967
OpenAlexW4389481779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.