ArticleCureus2023
Mandibular Posterior Anatomic Limit for Distalization in Patients With Various Patterns of Third Molar Impactions: A Three-Dimensional Cone Beam CT (CBCT) Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mandibular Molar Distalization Using Interradicular Microimplants and Indirect Anchorage: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Association between mandibular third molar impaction pattern and mandibular crowding severity: a retrospective radiographic study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Anatomical Variations of the Mandibular Buccal Shelf According to Sex, Facial Biotype, and Root Reference: A CBCT Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim was to compare and evaluate the variation in the mandible's posterior anatomic limits (MPAL) stratified by different third molar impaction patterns utilizing cone-beam CT (CBCT) in individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion. METHODOLOGY: The sample consisted of CBCT records of 80 samples of Class III patients categorized based on the pattern of their third molar impaction. The shortest linear distances from the distal root of the second mandibular molar to the inner cortex of the mandibular body were measured at the crown level, at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and at the depths of 4, 6, and 8mm from the CEJ, all parallel to the posterior occlusal line. The MPAL of the four groups were compared. The Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was performed. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the MPAL distances between the groups.
resultsSignificant differences were noted between the four groups at every level. MPAL distances decreased towards apex in all the groups and was least at the 8mm root level. The greatest MPAL distances were noted in the no-impaction group followed by the horizontal. At 8mm, the MPAL were 4.2+/-1.3 in Group 3 (Control), 3.3+/-0.9 in Group 1 and 2.7+/-0.05 mm in Group 2. Though the amount of space available for distalization was greatest for the mesioangular group at the crown level, it was least at the 8mm level compared to other groups.
conclusionMPAL distances were shortest at the root level in Class III patients who had mesioangularly impacted third molars and care should be taken before attempting distalization in them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.