ArticleCureus2023
Innovative Reconstructive Management of Foot Macrodactyly in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macrodactyly is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by disproportionate hypertrophy of one or more digits or the forefoot, involving some or all tissue types. It is nonhereditary and can present alone or alongside other deformities. Usually, macrodactyly is treated with amputation of the affected toe or finger to reduce the chance of recurrence. In this paper, we present the case of a child with macrodactyly who was treated successfully without amputation and instead with a reconstruction of the toe shape to resemble a near-natural-looking toe with intact functions. The patient was a one-year-old female who presented with macrodactyly of her right great toe, right second toe, and forefoot. She had no history of other congenital deformities or systemic diseases. A reconstruction surgery was performed, which involved debulking the right great toe, right second toe, and forefoot. Also, it included the creation of the first web space and the restoration of the nailbed of the second toe. Postoperative follow-up revealed minimal complications. Thus, a second reconstructive surgery was performed, which included debulking and further reconstruction of the foot to improve the result. Several techniques exist for the reduction of macrodactyly that can achieve optimal results. The choice of technique depends on the specifics of the case and the experience of the surgeon. We therefore hope our technique will be beneficial for the management of future cases of macrodactyly. One year of follow-up after the second operation revealed maintained function and no regrowth recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.