ArticleHeliyon2024
Assessment in location of sciatic nerve between the ischial tuberosity and the greater trochanter of the femur: A cadaveric study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block: An educational review of anatomy and techniques - Part A: Proximal approaches.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The location description of the sciatic nerve (SN) of adult between the ischial tuberosity (IT) and the greater trochanter of the femur (GT) is inconsistent in publications, this impels us to investigate and measure the distance relationship with SN between IT and GT. Methods: Thirty-one adult cadavers were dissected to investigate the distance relationship of SN with the posterior prominent position of the ischial tuberosity (ppIT), the medial edge of IT (mIT) and the lateral prominent position of GT (lGT). Results: SN passed through the point of the junction of medial one-third and middle one-third of a length from ppIT to lGT, and the midpoint of a length from mIT to lGT from the average data of the total studied cadavers. From average data of female and male, the left SN passed through the point of the junction of the medial two-fifths and the lateral three-fifths of the length between mIT and lGT. Between ppIT and lGT, SN located in a range of proportions from 0.1 to 0.6 from medial to lateral. Between mIT and lGT, SN located in a range of proportions from 0.2 to 0.7 from medial to lateral and all SN passed through the middle third of the length. Conclusions: Different bony landmarks draw different location descriptions of anatomic structure. In anatomic study and clinical practice, the utilized bony landmark should be clearly and accurately identified the reference point, inaccurate bony landmark can result in erroneous localization of the interested anatomic structure and lead to operation failure or iatrogenic injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.