ArticleHeliyon2024
Leveraging multimodal MRI-based radiomics analysis with diverse machine learning models to evaluate lymphovascular invasion in clinically node-negative breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Habitat Imaging-Based Radiomics and Deep Learning Fusion for Preoperative Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study.Balkan medical journal · 2026Article
- From imaging to omics: deep learning is bridging MRI and liquid biopsy in bone tumor diagnosis.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in rectal cancer based on multimodal magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Advancing Prostate Cancer Assessment: A Biparametric MRI (T2WI and DWI/ADC)-Based Radiomic Approach to Predict Tumor-Stroma Ratio.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer via intratumoral and peritumoral multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging machine learning-based radiomics with Shapley additive explanations interpretability analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Enhanced Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Multimodal Feature Fusion with Radiomics and Transfer Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Predict Lymphovascular Invasion of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning model for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor expression status in breast cancer using ultrasound radiomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- MRI-based radiomic and machine learning for prediction of lymphovascular invasion status in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer based on clinical-MRI radiomics features.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Article
- Prior-Radiomics-Guided Multi-Scale Feature Extraction Network Utilizing Preoperative MRI: A Pioneering Approach for Lymphovascular Invasion Prediction in Invasive Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Decoding Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer: The Evolution From Radiomics to Topological Quantification for Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
- Robustness and Accuracy of Radiomics Models for Classifying IASLC Grading in Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Large Multicenter CT Database.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Time-to-Event Machine Learning Model Incorporating MRI-Derived Intratumoral Heterogeneity Score for Predicting Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Dual-Center Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Multiparametric MRI-Derived Habitat Radiomics in Subregional Analysis for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastatic Burden in Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate and validate the effectiveness of diverse radiomics models for preoperatively differentiating lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in clinically node-negative breast cancer (BC). Methods: This study included 198 patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative bc and pathologically confirmed LVI status from January 2018-July 2023. The training dataset consisted of 138 patients, while the validation dataset included 60. Radiomics features were extracted from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging obtained from T1WI, T2WI, DCE, DWI, and ADC sequences. Dimensionality reduction and feature selection techniques were applied to the extracted features. Subsequently, machine learning approaches, including logistic regression, support vector machine, classification and regression trees, k-nearest neighbors, and gradient boosting machine models (GBM), were constructed using the radiomics features. The best-performing radiomic model was selected based on its performance using the confusion matrix. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify variables for developing a clinical-radiological (Clin-Rad) model. Finally, a combined model incorporating both radiomics and clinical-radiological model features was created. Results: A total of 6195 radiomic features were extracted from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging. After applying dimensionality reduction and feature selection, seven valuable radiomics features were identified. Among the radiomics models, the GBM model demonstrated superior predictive efficiency and robustness, achieving area under the curve values (AUC) of 0.881 (0.823,0.940) and 0.820 (0.693,0.947) in the training and validation datasets, respectively. The Clin-Rad model was developed based on the peritumoral edema and DWI rim sign. In the training dataset, it achieved an AUC of 0.767 (0.681, 0.854), while in the validation dataset, it achieved an AUC of 0.734 (0.555-0.913). The combined model, which incorporated radiomics and the Clin-Rad model, showed the highest discriminatory capability. In the training dataset, it had an AUC value of 0.936 (0.892, 0.981), and in the validation dataset, it had an AUC value of 0.876 (0.757, 0.995). Additionally, decision curve analysis of the combined model revealed its optimal clinical efficacy. Conclusion: The combined model, integrating radiomics and clinical-radiological features, exhibited excellent performance in distinguishing LVI status. This non-invasive and efficient approach holds promise for aiding clinical decision-making in the context of clinically node-negative BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.