ArticleHeliyon2024
Prediction of the severity of exceeding design traffic loads on highway bridges.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Being a driver of failure consequences, forecasting the severity of events where design traffic load limits on bridges have been exceeded (DLEEs) is fundamental for road safety. Previous research has focused on estimating failure consequences by direct and indirect cost metrics. Only recently has research assessed severity unconventionally, in which the type of DLEEs was predicted by applying econometric models through Binomial Logistic Regression (BLR). Since machine learning models using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have not yet been explored, this study will enhance the literature as follows. First, two different 'severity' models were set up as a function of bridge-side, temporal-context, and traffic load hazard variables. Whilst the former relied on a BLR, the latter used an ANN. Second, the performance of these models was assessed using confusion matrixes, some performance indicators, and a cross-entropy parameter. Raw Weigh-In-Motion data on 7.4 M+ individual vehicle transits on a bridge along a primary roadway in Brescia (Italy) were processed. Although a similarly strong performance was achieved for BLR and ANN, the results indicated that ANN was able to predict severity records with a higher level of confidence than BLR on the case study dataset, with the cross-entropy of the ANN less than one third of that of the BLR. These analyses can support road authority traffic management to safeguard bridges from traffic load hazards. Finally, this study recommends future developments, such as considering the structural effects of traffic loads in the modelling, prioritizing traffic management actions among bridges at network level, and exploring the impact of ANN models in risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.